Literature DB >> 2137522

Repetition blindness: levels of processing.

N G Kanwisher1, M C Potter.   

Abstract

Repetition blindness (RB) is the failure to detect or recall repetitions of words in rapid serial visual presentation. Experiment 1 showed that synonym pairs are not susceptible to RB. In Experiments 2 and 3, RB was still found when one occurrence of the word was part of a compound noun phrase. In Experiment 4, homonyms produced RB if they were spelled identically (even if pronounced differently) but not if spelled differently and pronounced the same. Similarly spelled but otherwise unrelated word pairs appeared to generate RB (Experiment 5), but Experiment 6 produced an alternative account. Experiments 7 and 8 demonstrated that repeated letters are susceptible to RB only when displayed individually, not as part of two otherwise different words. It is concluded that RB can occur at either an orthographic (possibly morphemic) level or a case-independent letter level, depending on which unit (words or single letters) is the focus of processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2137522     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.1.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  24 in total

1.  Retroactive interference from translation equivalents: implications for first language forgetting.

Authors:  L Isurin; J L McDonald
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

3.  Orthographic similarity: the case of "reversed anagrams".

Authors:  Alison L Morris; Mary L Still
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

4.  Reverse "repetition blindness" and release from "repetition blindness": constructive variations on the "repetition blindness" effect.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; K H Wai
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1997

5.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.

Authors:  H W Kwak; H Egeth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-05

6.  Cambridge University versus Hebrew University: the impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew.

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Ram Frost
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

7.  Perceptual inhibition of expected inputs: The key that opens closed minds.

Authors:  W A Johnston; K J Hawley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-03

8.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

9.  Cross-language facilitation, semantic blindness, and the relation between language and memory: a reply to Altarriba and Soltano.

Authors:  D G MacKay; L Abrams; M J Pedroza; M D Miller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-11

10.  Repetition blindness for words and pictures: A failure to form stable type representations?

Authors:  Irina M Harris; William G Hayward; Manuel S Seet; Sally Andrews
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.