Literature DB >> 14979320

The role of culture in research misconduct.

Mark S Davis1.   

Abstract

There seems to be a taboo against discussing the role culture or national origin might play in research misconduct. Still, some observers wonder why so many scientists representing foreign cultures are among those found guilty of misconduct. Even after examining the scant available data, whether foreign nationals are disproportionately represented among Office of Research Integrity (ORI) respondents remains unclear. The lack of data, however, does not negate culture as a possible explanatory variable in research misconduct. Applying theories from sociological criminology, the author posits that the culture some researchers bring may be at odds with the norms of academic science and may emphasize ends more than means. As such, culture simply may be one of several etiological factors in research misconduct and should be considered in the spirit of objective scientific inquiry. Acknowledging the role of culture in the adherence to research ethics underscores the importance of education and training of both researchers and administrators in the responsible conduct of research and cultural diversity.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14979320     DOI: 10.1080/714906092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  20 in total

1.  Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: evidence from ORI case files.

Authors:  Mark S Davis; Michelle Riske-Morris; Sebastian R Diaz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  A qualitative approach to Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) training development: identification of metacognitive strategies.

Authors:  Vykinta Kligyte; Richard T Marcy; Sydney T Sevier; Elaine S Godfrey; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering.

Authors:  Vykinta Kligyte; Richard T Marcy; Ethan P Waples; Sydney T Sevier; Elaine S Godfrey; Michael D Mumford; Dean F Hougen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Mental models: an alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction.

Authors:  Meagan E Brock; Andrew Vert; Vykinta Kligyte; Ethan P Waples; Sydney T Sevier; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Perceptions of Work-Related Stress and Ethical Misconduct Amongst Non-tenured Researchers in Italy.

Authors:  Oronzo Parlangeli; Stefano Guidi; Enrica Marchigiani; Margherita Bracci; Paul M Liston
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  A Mixed-Method Analysis of Reports on 100 Cases of Improper Prescribing of Controlled Substances.

Authors:  James M DuBois; John T Chibnall; Emily E Anderson; Michelle Eggers; Kari Baldwin; Meghan Vasher
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2016-08-09

7.  In Their Own Words: Research Misconduct from the Perspective of Researchers in Malaysian Universities.

Authors:  Angelina P Olesen; Latifah Amin; Zurina Mahadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru.

Authors:  Andres M Carnero; Percy Mayta-Tristan; Kelika A Konda; Edward Mezones-Holguin; Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz; German F Alvarado; Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Jorge L Maguiña; Eddy R Segura; Antonio M Quispe; Edward S Smith; Angela M Bayer; Andres G Lescano
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  The Role of Culture and Acculturation in Researchers' Perceptions of Rules in Science.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Tammy English; Kari A Baldwin; James M DuBois
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students' responses to research integrity issues.

Authors:  Philip J Langlais; Blake J Bent
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.