Literature DB >> 11818914

The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial.

George Triadafilopoulos1, John K DiBaise, Timothy T Nostrant, Neil H Stollman, Paul K Anderson, M Michael Wolfe, Richard I Rothstein, John M Wo, Douglas A Corley, Marco G Patti, Louis V Antignano, John S Goff, Steven A Edmundowicz, Donald O Castell, John C Rabine, Michael S Kim, David S Utley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This multicenter prospective study investigated the longer-term (12 month) safety and efficacy of radiofrequency energy delivery for the treatment of GERD.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted of 118 patients with chronic heartburn and/or regurgitation who required antisecretory medication daily and had demonstrated pathologic esophageal acid exposure, a sliding hiatal hernia (<or=2 cm), and esophagitis (<or= grade 2). RF energy was delivered with the Stretta catheter and thermocouple-controlled generator to create thermal lesions below the mucosa at the gastroesophageal junction. GERD symptom scores, quality of life (SF-36), and medication use were assessed at 0, 1, 4, 6, and 12 months; esophageal acid exposure, motility, and endoscopy were assessed at 0 and 6 months.
RESULTS: Seventy-two men and 46 women were treated. At 12 months, 94 patients were available for follow-up. There were improvements after 12 months in the median heartburn score (4 to 1, p = 0.0001), GERD score (27 to 9, p = 0.0001), satisfaction (1 to 4, p = 0.0001), mental SF-36 (46.3 to 55.4, p < 0.0001), and physical SF-36 (40.9 to 53.1, p = 0.0001); proton pump inhibitor requirement fell from 88.1% to 30% of patients. Esophageal acid exposure improved significantly (10.2% to 6.4%, p = 0.0001). There were 10 (8.6%) complications, none of which required therapeutic intervention.
CONCLUSION: The Stretta procedure significantly improves GERD symptoms, quality of life, and esophageal acid exposure and eliminates the need for antisecretory medication in the majority of patients at 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818914     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.121227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  60 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-06

2.  [Endoscopic therapy of gastroesophageal reflux. Indications, first results].

Authors:  K Caca; B Schumacher; H Neuhaus
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Recent developments in gastroenterology.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi; Alex Ford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-12-14

Review 4.  Endoscopic therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Walter J Hogan
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2003-06

Review 5.  Endoscopic antireflux procedures.

Authors:  J Arts; J Tack; J P Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: Important considerations for the older patients.

Authors:  Maxwell M Chait
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-12-16

Review 7.  Endoluminal treatment of GERD--role in contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  John K DiBaise; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-08-04

8.  Outcomes of endoluminal gastric plication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Daniel C DeMarco; Robert D Anderson
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-10

9.  [Antireflux therapy--more than acid reduction?].

Authors:  T Frieling
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  Endoluminal fundoplication (ELF) for GERD using EsophyX: a 12-month follow-up in a single-center experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Repici; Uberto Fumagalli; Alberto Malesci; Roberta Barbera; Camilla Gambaro; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.