Literature DB >> 18068455

Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.

James A Eastham1, Kentaro Kuroiwa, Makoto Ohori, Angel M Serio, Alex Gorbonos, Norio Maru, Andrew J Vickers, Kevin M Slawin, Thomas M Wheeler, Victor E Reuter, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cancer at the resection margin is associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) even after adjusting for other known clinical and pathologic risk factors. In this study, we assessed the prognostic significance of sites of positive surgical margins (+SMs) in RP specimens.
METHODS: We reviewed the data from 2442 patients with clinical Stage T1-T3 prostate cancer treated with RP from 1983 to 2004 who had had tumor maps generated from whole mount sections. The site of +SMs was assigned to six different areas (apex, bladder neck, seminal vesicle, anterior, posterolateral, and posterior).
RESULTS: Of the 2442 patients, 201 (8.2%) had a +SM at a single site and 74 (3.0%) had a +SM at multiple sites in the RP specimen. The posterolateral and apex sections were the most commonly involved sites for a +SM. Those with a +SM had a greater risk of biochemical recurrence than those with negative surgical margins (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.004 to 1.92; P = 0.047). We found that a +SM at the posterolateral site was significantly associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence (hazard ratio 2.80 for +SMs versus negative SMs at the posterolateral region; 95% confidence interval 1.76 to 4.44).
CONCLUSIONS: The effect on biochemical recurrence was influenced by the site of the +SM, with a posterolateral location having the most significant effect on prognosis. This heterogeneity of margin status has implications for predictive modeling, as well as the recommendation for adjuvant radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18068455     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  34 in total

1.  Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ioannis Anastasiou; Stavros I Tyritzis; Ioannis Adamakis; Dionysios Mitropoulos; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Antonios Balangas; Anastasios Kollias; Kitty Pavlakis; Constantinos A Constantinides
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point.

Authors:  Andrew Vickers; Fernando Bianco; Angel Cronin; James Eastham; Eric Klein; Michael Kattan; Peter Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of partial secondary resection of neurovascular bundles and its effect on oncologic and functional outcome.

Authors:  Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Gregor Weirich; Michael Autenrieth; Tobias Maurer; Mark Thalgott; Thomas Horn; Matthias Heck; Kathleen Herkommer; Jürgen E Gschwend; Hubert Kübler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.

Authors:  H Wadhwa; M K Terris; W J Aronson; C J Kane; C L Amling; M R Cooperberg; S J Freedland; M R Abern
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.554

5.  Surgical margin status among men with organ-confined (pT2) prostate cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Nathan Lawrentschuk; Andrew Evans; John Srigley; Joseph L Chin; Bish Bora; Amber Hunter; Robin McLeod; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Ethnic variation in pelvimetric measures and its impact on positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Christian von Bodman; Mika P Matikainen; Luis Herran Yunis; Vincent Laudone; Peter T Scardino; Oguz Akin; Farhang Rabbani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Location, extent, and multifocality of positive surgical margins for biochemical recurrence prediction after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Sarah J Drouin; Julie Rode; Yves Allory; Dimitri Vordos; Andras Hoznek; Claude-Clément Abbou; Alexandre de la Taille; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Elmar Heinrich; Georg Schön; Frank Schiefelbein; Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Fluorescent Image-Guided Surgery with an Anti-Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA) Diabody Enables Targeted Resection of Mouse Prostate Cancer Xenografts in Real Time.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Andrew S Behesnilian; Ziyue Karen Jiang; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Eric J Lepin; Laurent A Bentolila; Scott M Knowles; Daniel Lawrence; Anna M Wu; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Obesity and positive surgical margins by anatomic location after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.

Authors:  Jayakrishnan Jayachandran; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Joseph C Presti; Christopher L Amling; Christopher J Kane; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.