Literature DB >> 20358209

Clinical impact of intraoperative frozen sections during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Elmar Heinrich1, Georg Schön, Frank Schiefelbein, Maurice Stephan Michel, Lutz Trojan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Enhanced surgical techniques and standardised selection criteria have led to a higher rate of nerve-sparing (NS) radical prostatectomy (RP) procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of intraoperative frozen sections (IFS) during nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thousand and eighty-three patients with localised prostatic carcinoma were treated using retropubic RP (from 2004 to 2006). Two hundred and eighty-seven of the 1083 documented cases received NS. One hundred and thirty procedures were carried out with IFS from the area of the neurovascular bundles and 157 without IFS. The decision to use IFS was made intraoperatively and based on clinical suspicion of possible positive resection margins in the area of the bundles.
RESULTS: In the NS group with IFS, the results revealed positive margins in nine (6.9%) out of 130 cases, resulting in subsequent resection of the ipsilateral neurovascular bundle. The final histological report on this group revealed four additional patients (3.1%) with positive margins, but only one (0.7%) in the area of the previous neurovascular bundle. The final histopathologic reports on the 157 NS cases without IFS showed that the positive margin was in the area of the previous neurovascular bundle in only one (0.6%) of the nine cases with positive margins (5.7%).
CONCLUSION: According to our data, there is no need for routine IFS during NSRP. The negative predictive value for infiltration of the NVB is high, and IFS can be dispensed with. Intraoperative biopsies should be taken in those cases where the surgeon is in doubt about the resection margins in the area of bundles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20358209     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0529-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations.

Authors:  P Gontero; R S Kirby
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Intraoperative frozen section monitoring of nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  T G Cangiano; M S Litwin; J Naitoh; F Dorey; J B deKernion
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles.

Authors:  D M Quinlan; J I Epstein; B S Carter; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis of surgical margins in region of neurovascular bundles at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Reza Z Goharderakhshan; Daniel Sudilovsky; Lauren A Carroll; Gary D Grossfeld; Richard Marn; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression.

Authors:  Mario Sofer; Kara L Hamilton-Nelson; Francisco Civantos; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A validated strategy for side specific prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: a tool to select for nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  M Graefen; A Haese; U Pichlmeier; P G Hammerer; J Noldus; K Butz; A Erbersdobler; R P Henke; U Michl; S Fernandez; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Effects of pathologic stage on the learning curve for radical prostatectomy: evidence that recurrence in organ-confined cancer is largely related to inadequate surgical technique.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Fernando J Bianco; Mithat Gonen; Angel M Cronin; James A Eastham; Deborah Schrag; Eric A Klein; Alwyn M Reuther; Michael W Kattan; J Edson Pontes; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  W J Catalona; J W Basler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Clinical staging error in prostate cancer: localization and relevance of undetected tumour areas.

Authors:  Christian Bolenz; Michael Gierth; Rainer Grobholz; Thomas Köpke; Axel Semjonow; Christel Weiss; Peter Alken; Maurice Stephan Michel; Lutz Trojan
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Guilherme Godoy; Basir U Tareen; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  2 in total

1.  NeuroSAFE robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for men with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Eoin Dinneen; Aiman Haider; Clare Allen; Alex Freeman; Tim Briggs; Senthil Nathan; Chris Brew-Graves; Jack Grierson; Norman R Williams; Raj Persad; Neil Oakley; Jim M Adshead; Hartwig Huland; Alexander Haese; Greg Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Ryu; Yun Beom Kim; Tae Young Jung; Woo Jin Ko; Sun Il Kim; Dongdeuk Kwon; Duk Yoon Kim; Tae Hee Oh; Tag Keun Yoo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.