OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the ethnic variation in pelvimetry and its impact as a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) at radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Preoperative MRI was performed in 482 Caucasian and 103 African American (AA) men undergoing RP without previous treatment from July 2003 to January 2005 and November 2001 to June 2007, respectively. We measured bony and soft tissue dimensions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the pelvic inlet, midplane, prostate size, and apical depth. Analysis of covariance was performed to determine the effect of ethnicity on the midpelvic area (MPA). We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis for prediction of overall and site-specific PSM. RESULTS: AA men had a significantly steeper symphysis pubis angle (median, 43.1 vs. 41.3°, respectively, P = .001) and smaller MPA (median, 78.5 vs. 83.9 cm(2), respectively, P = .004). Ethnicity and BMI were found to have a significant effect on MPA. Apical depth of the prostate was identified as a significant independent predictor of apical PSM, with a more pronounced effect in AA men. Pelvimetric measures were not a significant predictor of other sites of PSM. CONCLUSIONS: AA men have a significantly smaller MPA and steeper symphysis angle. The adverse impact of a deep pelvis, as measured by the apical prostatic depth on apical PSM was found to be greater in AA men. Evaluation of pelvic dimensions and prostate parameters in preoperative MRI may add to our understanding of their impact on surgical outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the ethnic variation in pelvimetry and its impact as a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) at radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: Preoperative MRI was performed in 482 Caucasian and 103 African American (AA) men undergoing RP without previous treatment from July 2003 to January 2005 and November 2001 to June 2007, respectively. We measured bony and soft tissue dimensions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the pelvic inlet, midplane, prostate size, and apical depth. Analysis of covariance was performed to determine the effect of ethnicity on the midpelvic area (MPA). We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis for prediction of overall and site-specific PSM. RESULTS: AA men had a significantly steeper symphysis pubis angle (median, 43.1 vs. 41.3°, respectively, P = .001) and smaller MPA (median, 78.5 vs. 83.9 cm(2), respectively, P = .004). Ethnicity and BMI were found to have a significant effect on MPA. Apical depth of the prostate was identified as a significant independent predictor of apical PSM, with a more pronounced effect in AA men. Pelvimetric measures were not a significant predictor of other sites of PSM. CONCLUSIONS: AA men have a significantly smaller MPA and steeper symphysis angle. The adverse impact of a deep pelvis, as measured by the apical prostatic depth on apical PSM was found to be greater in AA men. Evaluation of pelvic dimensions and prostate parameters in preoperative MRI may add to our understanding of their impact on surgical outcomes.
Authors: K M Boyle; D Petty; A G Chalmers; P Quirke; A Cairns; P J Finan; P M Sagar; D Burke Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Khurshid A Guru; Adam E Perlmutter; Matthew J Sheldon; Zubair M Butt; Shaozeng Zhang; Wei Tan; Gregory Wilding; Hyung L Kim; James L Mohler Journal: J Endourol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Sung Kyu Hong; In Ho Chang; Byung Kyu Han; Ji Hyung Yu; June Hyun Han; Seong Jin Jeong; Hyeon Jeong; Seok-Soo Byun; Hak Jong Lee; Sang Eun Lee Journal: Urology Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: R Tiguert; E L Gheiler; M V Tefilli; M Banerjee; D J Grignon; W Sakr; D P Wood; I J Powell; J E Pontes Journal: Prostate Date: 1998-12-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Joseph A Pettus; Christopher J Weight; Clinton J Thompson; Richard G Middleton; Robert A Stephenson Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Ofer Yossepowitch; Anders Bjartell; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Bertrand D Guillonneau; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Rodolfo Montironi; Franceso Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Michael S Leapman; Stephen J Freedland; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Martha K Terris; Kelly Walker; Christopher L Amling; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-06-25 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Adam B Murphy; Ramona Bhatia; Iman K Martin; David A Klein; Courtney M P Hollowell; Yaw Nyame; Elodi Dielubanza; Chad Achenbach; Rick A Kittles Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2014-07-25 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Farzana A Faisal; Debasish Sundi; John L Cooper; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer Journal: Urology Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Hong Koo Ha; Henk B Luiting; Petra L Graham; Manish I Patel; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Oguz Akin; Sean F Mungovan Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 2.264