Literature DB >> 18068405

Risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke plume: a review of the literature.

Lorraine Bigony1.   

Abstract

Electrosurgery, laser ablation, and ultrasonic scalpel dissection create a gaseous by-product commonly referred to as surgical smoke or plume. Smoke evacuation devices have been shown to be effective in limiting exposure to the noxious odor and potential health hazards of smoke and plume; however, these devices have not been used routinely and consistently in many ORs. This article reviews five quantitative research studies that explore the characteristics of smoke plume produced during surgery and presents the evidence of the need for consistent use of smoke evacuation systems. AORN, Inc, 2007

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18068405     DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2007.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AORN J        ISSN: 0001-2092            Impact factor:   0.676


  21 in total

1.  Surgical smoke management for minimally invasive (micro)endoscopy: an experimental study.

Authors:  Dietmar Mattes; Edah Silajdzic; Monika Mayer; Martin Horn; Daniel Scheidbach; Werner Wackernagel; Gerald Langmann; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Automatic smoke evacuation in laparoscopic surgery: a simplified method for objective evaluation.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Masashi Hirota; Yasuaki Miyazaki; Jeong Ho Moon; Yoshihito Souma; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Safety considerations for Health care Workers involved in Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Aditi Bhatt; Sourabh Mittal; K S Gopinath
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02

4.  Current Evidence for Minimally Invasive Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Risk Mitigation Strategies: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Keegan Guidolin; Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Abdu Sharkawy; Antonino Spinelli; Fayez A Quereshy; Allan Okrainec
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Surgical smoke control with local exhaust ventilation: Experimental study.

Authors:  Taekhee Lee; Jhy-Charm Soo; Ryan F LeBouf; Dru Burns; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Michael Kashon; Jay Bowers; Martin Harper
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  The management of surgical patients in the emergency setting during COVID-19 pandemic: the WSES position paper.

Authors:  Belinda De Simone; Elie Chouillard; Massimo Sartelli; Walter L Biffl; Salomone Di Saverio; Ernest E Moore; Yoram Kluger; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Ari Leppänemi; Andrew B Peitzmann; Leonardo Pagani; Gustavo P Fraga; Ciro Paolillo; Edoardo Picetti; Massimo Valentino; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Barry N Swerdlow
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Secondhand smoke in the operating room? Precautionary practices lacking for surgical smoke.

Authors:  Andrea L Steege; James M Boiano; Marie H Sweeney
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 9.  Energetic soft-tissue treatment technologies: an overview of procedural fundamentals and safety factors.

Authors:  N J van de Berg; J J van den Dobbelsteen; F W Jansen; C A Grimbergen; J Dankelman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A study to quantify surgical plume and survey the efficiency of different local exhaust ventilations.

Authors:  Ping-Chia Cheng; Ming-Hsun Wen; Wan-Lun Hsu; Po-Wen Cheng; Li-Jen Liao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.