Literature DB >> 20339874

Surgical smoke management for minimally invasive (micro)endoscopy: an experimental study.

Dietmar Mattes1, Edah Silajdzic, Monika Mayer, Martin Horn, Daniel Scheidbach, Werner Wackernagel, Gerald Langmann, Andreas Wedrich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of surgical smoke-producing procedures such as laser ablation or electrosurgery in minimally invasive microendoscopic procedures. This study proposes a technical solution to efficiently remove surgical smoke from very small endoscopic cavities using microports as small as 20 G (0.9 mm) in diameter.
METHODS: The experimental laboratory study used small, rigid, transparent plastic cavity models connected with tubes and pressure sensors to establish an endoscopic in vitro laboratory model. A Kalium-Titanyl-Phosphate (KTP) laser with a 0.5-mm fiber optic probe was used to produce smoke from bovine scleral tissue in the cavity. Endoscopic gas insufflation into the model was generated by pressurized air and a microvalve. A laboratory vacuum pump provided smoke and gas suction via a microvalve. A self-built control and steering system was utilized to control intracavital pressure during experimental insufflation and suction.
RESULTS: Problems related to smoke-generating processes, such as laser vaporization or electrocautery, in small closed cavities were first analyzed. A theoretical and mechatronic laboratory model was established and tested. Intracavital pressure and gas flow were measured first without and then with smoke generation. A new construction design for the suction tube was proposed due to rapid obstruction by smoke particles.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical smoke evacuation from endoscopic cavities that are as small as 2 cm in diameter via minimally invasive ports as small as 20 G (0.9 mm) in diameter may be safe and efficient if sufficient gas exchange is provided during smoke generation by laser or electrosurgical instruments. However, maintaining a low and constant pressure in the cavity during gas exchange and adopting a special construction design for the suction tube are essential to provide an excellent view during the surgical maneuver and to minimize potential toxic side effects of the smoke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20339874     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-0991-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  24 in total

1.  Development of an orbital endoscope for use with the free electron laser.

Authors:  Louise A Mawn; Jin-Hui Shen; David R Jordan; Karen M Joos
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.746

2.  Optic nerve sheath fenestration with endoscopic accessory instruments versus the free electron laser (FEL).

Authors:  Karen M Joos; Rohan J Shah; Richard D Robinson; Jin H Shen
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 3.  Risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke plume: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Lorraine Bigony
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.676

Review 4.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview.

Authors:  John R Romanelli; David B Earle
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  NOTES: a review of the technical problems encountered and their solutions.

Authors:  Yoav Mintz; Santiago Horgan; John Cullen; David Stuart; Eric Falor; Mark A Talamini
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 6.  Laparoscopy and adhesion formation, adhesions and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas E Ott
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  Cytotoxicity of electro-surgical smoke produced in an anoxic environment.

Authors:  C Hensman; E L Newman; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot air?

Authors:  W L Barrett; S M Garber
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Airborne mutagens produced by frying beef, pork and a soy-based food.

Authors:  H P Thiébaud; M G Knize; P A Kuzmicky; D P Hsieh; J S Felton
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.023

10.  Neonatal minimally invasive surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernias: a multicenter study using thoracoscopy or laparoscopy.

Authors:  Cindy Gomes Ferreira; Olivier Reinberg; François Becmeur; Hossein Allal; Pascal De Lagausie; Hubert Lardy; Paul Philippe; Manuel Lopez; François Varlet; Guillaume Podevin; Jürgen Schleef; Max Schlobach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

1.  GPU-based efficient realistic techniques for bleeding and smoke generation in surgical simulators.

Authors:  Tansel Halic; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.547

2.  Automatic smoke evacuation in laparoscopic surgery: a simplified method for objective evaluation.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Masashi Hirota; Yasuaki Miyazaki; Jeong Ho Moon; Yoshihito Souma; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A novel suction/coagulation integrated probe for achieving better hemostasis: development and clinical use.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Chu Matsuda; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  J Edward F Fitzgerald; Momin Malik; Irfan Ahmed
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effect of nanostructured thin film on minimally invasive surgery devices applications: characterization, cell cytotoxicity evaluation and an animal study in rat.

Authors:  Keng-Liang Ou; Chao-Chia Weng; Erwan Sugiatno; Muhammad Ruslin; Yun-Ho Lin; Han-Yi Cheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.