Literature DB >> 18064457

Comparison of bioabsorbable interference screws and posts for distal fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Krzysztof Gaweda1, Jacek Walawski, Robert Wegłowski, Wojciech Krzyzanowski.   

Abstract

Comparison of the results of bioabsorbable interference screws and posts for hamstring graft distal fixation in ACL reconstructions are presented. The results of 20 patients with bioabsorbable screws were compared to 22 patients with posts. The assessement was based on Lysholm-Gillquist and Marshall scores and the KT-1000 device. In the study group the points gained were 38.9 in the Lysholm-Gillquist and 12.89 in the Marshall scale. The average KT-1000 difference was 2.46 mm. In the control group the points gained were 32.93 in the Lysholm-Gillquist and 11.47 in the Marshall scale. The average KT-1000 difference was 2.5 mm. There were 14 patients in the study group with interference screw problems; in 2 the implants were removed. (1) There are no differences in outcome using bioabsorbable interference screws and posts for distal fixation of hamstring ACL grafts. (2) The lack of bioabsorbtion with poly L-lactide interference screws is frequent and causes problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18064457      PMCID: PMC2899212          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0482-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Chondral lesions after arthroscopic meniscus repair using meniscus arrows.

Authors:  R Seil; S Rupp; M Dienst; B Mueller; H Bonkhoff; D M Kohn
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation.

Authors:  C Benjamin Ma; Kimberly Francis; Jeffrey Towers; Jay Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher H Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Failed resorption of bioabsorbable meniscus repair devices.

Authors:  Mehmet Asik; Ata Can Atalar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Femoral interference screw divergence after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provoking severe anterior knee pain.

Authors:  Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; Mercedes Tintó-Pedrerol
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Mechanical properties of soft tissue femoral fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher S Ahmad; Thomas R Gardner; Megan Groh; Johnny Arnouk; William N Levine
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon-bone compared with double semitendinosus and gracilis tendon grafts. A prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paolo Aglietti; Francesco Giron; Roberto Buzzi; Flavio Biddau; Francesco Sasso
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Potential complication of bioabsorbable screw fixation for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee.

Authors:  T N Scioscia; J R Giffin; C R Allen; C D Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A prospective randomized study with a two-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lars Ejerhed; Jüri Kartus; Ninni Sernert; Kristina Köhler; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Broken poly-L-lactic acid interference screw after ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian L Shafer; Peter T Simonian
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Rehabilitation after one-stage anterior cruciate reconstruction and osteochondral grafting.

Authors:  Krzysztof Gaweda; Jacek Walawski; Robert Wegłowski; Maciej Patyra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  6 in total

1.  An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices.

Authors:  Ofir Chechik; Eyal Amar; Morsi Khashan; Ran Lador; Gil Eyal; Aviram Gold
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The unpredictable material properties of bioabsorbable PLC interference screws and their adverse effects in ACL reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Croatia.

Authors:  Alan Mahnik; Silvija Mahnik; Damjan Dimnjakovic; Stjepan Curic; Tomislav Smoljanovic; Ivan Bojanic
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

Review 4.  Femoral fracture following knee ligament reconstruction surgery due to an unpredictable complication of bioabsorbable screw fixation: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Sujith Konan; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-12-17

5.  Absorbable implants versus metal implants for the treatment of ankle fractures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zong-Huan Li; Ai-Xi Yu; Xiao-Peng Guo; Bai-Wen Qi; Min Zhou; Wei-Yang Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at a Minimum of 2 Years Using Adjustable Suspensory Fixation in Both the Femur and Tibia: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet; Mo Saffarini; Nicolas Bouguennec
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.