Literature DB >> 24147268

Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Croatia.

Alan Mahnik1, Silvija Mahnik, Damjan Dimnjakovic, Stjepan Curic, Tomislav Smoljanovic, Ivan Bojanic.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate current preferences and opinions on the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury in Croatia.
METHODS: The survey was conducted using a questionnaire which was sent by e-mail to all 189 members of the Croatian Orthopaedic and Traumatology Association. Only respondents who had performed at least one ACL reconstruction during 2011 were asked to fill out the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Thirty nine surgeons responded to the survey. Nearly all participants (95%) used semitendinosus/gracilis tendon autograft for reconstruction and only 5% used bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. No other graft type had been used. The accessory anteromedial portal was preferred over the transtibial approach (67% vs 33%). Suspensory fixation was the most common graft fixation method (62%) for the femoral side, followed by the cross-pin (33%) and bioabsorbable interference screw (5%). Almost all respondents (97%) used a bioabsorbable interference screw for tibial side graft fixation.
CONCLUSION: The results show that ACL reconstruction surgery in Croatia is in step with the recommendations from latest world literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Knee; Reconstruction; Surgery; Survey

Year:  2013        PMID: 24147268      PMCID: PMC3801252          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  43 in total

1.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Volker Steuber; Daniel Kendoff; Dan Choi; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle; David W Altchek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Overlapping systematic reviews of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft: why are they different?

Authors:  Rudolf W Poolman; Jihad A K Abouali; Henry J Conter; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Thomas R Duquin; William M Wind; Marc S Fineberg; Robert J Smolinski; Cathy M Buyea
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective randomised outcome study.

Authors:  Annette Heijne; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Steven B Cohen; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 6.  Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Baer; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 7.  The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Francisco Lajara; Gonzalo Samitier; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: part I: continuous passive motion, early weight bearing, postoperative bracing, and home-based rehabilitation.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Emily Preston; Braden C Fleming; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; John A Bergfeld; Warren R Dunn; Chris Kaeding; John E Kuhn; Robert G Marx; Eric C McCarty; Richard C Parker; Kurt P Spindler; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Glenn N Williams
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  A randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of functional knee brace and neoprene sleeve use after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Trevor B Birmingham; Dianne M Bryant; J Robert Giffin; Robert B Litchfield; John F Kramer; Allan Donner; Peter J Fowler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004-2007: baseline epidemiology.

Authors:  Lars-Petter Granan; Magnus Forssblad; Martin Lind; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  An Liu; Miao Sun; Chiyuan Ma; Yunlin Chen; Xinghe Xue; Peng Guo; Zhongli Shi; Shigui Yan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: a survey between the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) members.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Alberto Vascellari; Alberto Combi; Luca Tomaello; Gian Luigi Canata; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-14

3.  Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Delhi.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Sachin Ingole; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-01-21

4.  A security evaluation of the Rigid-fix crosses pin system used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in tibial fixation site.

Authors:  Huaqiang Fan; Jian Wang; Yangpan Fu; Huixiang Dong; Jianxiong Wang; Cong Tang; Changming Huang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

5.  Preferences in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport: A survey among surgeons in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Baris B Koc; Martijn G M Schotanus; Edwin J P Jansen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-02-10

Review 6.  Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Review.

Authors:  Raju Vaishya; Amit Kumar Agarwal; Sachin Ingole; Vipul Vijay
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-11-13

7.  CURRENT PANORAMA OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY IN BRAZIL.

Authors:  Gustavo Constantino de Campos; Luccas Franco Bettencourt Nunes; Luciano Rodrigo Peres Arruda; Paulo Eduardo Portes Teixeira; Guilherme Husemann Albamonte Amaral; Wilson de Mello Alves
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  Activity demands and instability are the most important factors for recommending to treat ACL injuries with reconstruction.

Authors:  Hanna Tigerstrand Grevnerts; Anne Fältström; Sofi Sonesson; Håkan Gauffin; Siw Carlfjord; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Safety of the application of Rigidfix cross-pin system via different tibial tunnels for tibial fixation during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Hua-Qiang Fan; Wenli Dai; Hong-Da Li; Yang-Pan Fu; Zhenhuang Liu; Chang-Ming Huang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rohan Bhimani; Reza Shahriarirad; Keivan Ranjbar; Amirhossein Erfani; Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.