Literature DB >> 18060656

[Safety aspects in high-field magnetic resonance imaging].

M Mühlenweg1, G Schaefers, S Trattnig.   

Abstract

With more and more 3 Tesla high-field magnetic resonance (MR) scanners entering clinical routine, the safety notion in MR imaging has also reached a new dimension. The first part of this paper deals with the three most important sources of physical interaction (static magnetic field, gradient and HF fields). The paper discusses the differences compared with the traditional clinical 1.5 T standard scanners, the impact on human beings, the interactions with metallic objects and the relevant safety standards. The second part of the paper examines the issue of MR safety as seen in clinical practice and tries to demonstrate optimization potentials. This includes structural optimization in information distribution and hospital organization as well as test standards and labeling guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18060656     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-007-1598-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  12 in total

1.  Sound-level measurements and calculations of safe noise dosage during EPI at 3 T.

Authors:  J R Foster; D A Hall; A Q Summerfield; A R Palmer; R W Bowtell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields.

Authors:  D J Schaefer; J D Bourland; J A Nyenhuis
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Safety of strong, static magnetic fields.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Physiologic effects of intense MR imaging gradient fields.

Authors:  J D Bourland; J A Nyenhuis; D J Schaefer
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Specific absorption rate as a poor indicator of magnetic resonance-related implant heating.

Authors:  Wolfgang R Nitz; Gerd Brinker; Dirk Diehl; Georg Frese
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  Testing methods for MR safety and compatibility of medical devices.

Authors:  Gregor Schaefers; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.442

7.  Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-induced deep second-degree burns of lower extremities by conducting loop.

Authors:  Y Ito; Y Omoto; K Habe; K-I Yamanaka; A Hakamada; K-I Isoda; I Kurokawa; H Mizutani
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Increased time rate of change of gradient fields: effect on peripheral nerve stimulation at clinical MR imaging.

Authors:  Florian M Vogt; Mark E Ladd; Peter Hunold; Serban Mateiescu; Franz X Hebrank; Al Zhang; Jörg F Debatin; Susanne C Göhde
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-09-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  [Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF)--implications for radiology].

Authors:  H J Michaely; H S Thomsen; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 10.  Medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.316

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Risks and safety aspects related to PET/MR examinations.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Elke A Nekolla; Dietmar Nosske; Jürgen Griebel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.