| Literature DB >> 18044074 |
Tamas Fülöp1, Anis Larbi, Katsuiku Hirokawa, Eugenio Mocchegiani, Bruno Lesourds, Stephen Castle, Anders Wikby, Claudio Franceschi, Graham Pawelec.
Abstract
The primary role of the immune system is to protect the organism against pathogens, but age-associated alterations to immunity increase the susceptibility of the elderly to infectious disease. The exact nature of these changes is still controversial, but the use of screening procedures, such as the SENIEUR protocol to exclude underlying illness, helped to better characterize the changes actually related to physiological aging rather than pathology. It is generally agreed that the most marked changes occur in the cellular immune response reflecting profound alterations in T cells. Much of this is due to thymic involution as well as changes in the proportions of T cell subpopulations resulting from antigen exposure, and altered T cell activation pathways. However, a body of data indicates that innate immune responses, including the critical bridge between innate and adaptive immunity, and antigen presenting capacity are not completely resistant to senescence processes. The consequences of all these alterations are an increased incidence of infections, as well as possibly cancers, autoimmune disorders, and chronic inflammatory diseases. The leading question is what, if anything, can we do to prevent these deleterious changes without dangerously dysregulating the precarious balance of productive immunity versus immunopathology? There are many potential new therapeutic means now available to modulate immunosenescence and many others are expected to be available shortly. One main problem in applying these experimental therapies is ethical: there is a common feeling that as ageing is not a disease; the elderly are not sick and therefore do not require adventurous therapies with unpredictable side-effects in mostly frail individuals. Animal models are not helpful in this context. In this chapter we will first briefly review what we think we know about human immunosenescence and its consequences for the health status of elderly individuals. We will then discuss possible interventions that might one day become applicable in an appropriate ethical environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 18044074 PMCID: PMC2684090 DOI: 10.2147/ciia.2007.2.1.33
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Interv Aging ISSN: 1176-9092 Impact factor: 4.458
Figure 1The immune system in the elderly. The function and parameters which change during aging are summarized in this figure.
Abbreviations: CMV, cytomegalovirus; DISC, death-inducing signaling complex; IL-2, interleukin-2; KLRG-1, killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily G member 1; NF-AT, nuclear factor of activated T cells; NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PKC, protein kinase C, TCR, T cell receptor.
Figure 2The aging process and its clinical consequences.
Figure 3Preventive/curative strategies to counteract the aging immune system. The strategies depicted are those under current investigation or those proposed in this chapter.
Abbreviations: NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids.