Literature DB >> 19879476

Bladder cancer in the elderly.

Shahrokh F Shariat1, Matthew Milowsky, Michael J Droller.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Age is now widely accepted as the greatest single risk factor for developing bladder cancer, and bladder cancer is considered as primarily a disease of the elderly. Because of the close link between age and incidence of bladder cancer, it can be expected that this disease will become an enormous challenge with the growth of an aging population in the years ahead.
METHODS: Using MEDLINE, a search of the literature between January 1966 and July 2007 was performed to describe normative physiologic changes associated with aging, elucidate genetic and epigenetic alterations that associate aging with bladder cancer and its phenotypes; and to characterize how aging influences efficacies, risks, side effects, and potential complications of the treatments needed for the various stages of bladder cancer.
RESULTS: We discuss influence of aging on host physiology, genetic and epigenetic changes, environmental influences, and host factors in the development and treatment of bladder cancer. Treatments with intravesical bacille Calmette Guerin, radical cystectomy, and perioperative chemotherapy are less well tolerated and have poorer response in elderly patients compared with their younger counterparts. Elderly patients face both clinical and broader institutional barriers to appropriate treatment and may receive less aggressive treatment and sub-therapeutic dosing. However, when appropriately selected, elderly patients tolerate and respond well to cancer treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: The decision to undergo treatment for cancer is a tradeoff between loss of function and/or independence and extension of life, which is complicated by a host of concomitant issues such as comorbid medical conditions, functional declines and "frailty", family dynamics, and social and psychologic issues. Chronological age should not preclude definitive surgical therapy. It is imperative that healthcare practitioners and researchers from disparate disciplines collectively focus efforts towards gaining a better understanding of what the consequences of bladder cancer and its treatments are for older adults and how to appropriately meet the multifaceted medical and psychosocial needs of this growing population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19879476      PMCID: PMC4225777          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  160 in total

1.  Long-term followup of patients less than 30 years old with transitional cell carcinoma of bladder.

Authors:  I Madgar; B Goldwasser; O Nativ; Y Hanani; P Jonas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Age-related physiological changes and their clinical significance.

Authors:  G R Boss; J E Seegmiller
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1981-12

3.  Bladder carcinoma in patients age 40 years or younger.

Authors:  J Wan; H B Grossman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Granulomatous hepatitis following intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy for bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  H Y Marans; H M Bekirov
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Bladder carcinoma in patients less than 40 years of age.

Authors:  J A Witjes; F M Debruyne
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Carcinoma of the bladder in patients less than 40 years old.

Authors:  D E Johnson; S Hillis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Bladder carcinoma in patients 40 years old or less.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; M Reda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in children and adolescents.

Authors:  R C Benson; K M Tomera; P P Kelalis
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prognostic effect of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  W D Dewys; C Begg; P T Lavin; P R Band; J M Bennett; J R Bertino; M H Cohen; H O Douglass; P F Engstrom; E Z Ezdinli; J Horton; G J Johnson; C G Moertel; M M Oken; C Perlia; C Rosenbaum; M N Silverstein; R T Skeel; R W Sponzo; D C Tormey
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  The natural history of patients less than 40 years old with bladder tumors.

Authors:  K R Kurz; W R Pitts; E D Vaughan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  43 in total

Review 1.  [Advanced bladder cancer in elderly patients. Prognostic outcomes and therapeutic strategies].

Authors:  M Rink; F K Chun; T F Chromecki; H Fajkovic; R Dahlem; M Fisch; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Multicenter validation of the prognostic value of patient age in patients treated with radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Julian Mauermann; Eugene K Cha; Robert S Svatek; Harun Fajkovic; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Yair Lotan; Derya Tilki; Patrick J Bastian; Bjoern G Volkmer; Francesco Montorsi; Wassim Kassouf; Giacomo Novara; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Vincenzo Ficarra; Christian G Stief; Colin P Dinney; Eila Skinner; Karl Pummer; Yves Fradet; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Chronological age is not an independent predictor of clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Behfar Ehdaie; Giacomo Novara; Karl Pummer; Richard Zigeuner; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Richard K Lee; Eugene K Cha; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Casey Ng; Jay D Raman; Felix K Chun; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Thomas J Walton; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-04-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Frailty as a prognostic indicator in the radical cystectomy population: a review.

Authors:  Niki Parikh; Pranav Sharma
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Finding treatment success in patients unfit for radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Michael Leveridge
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Ileal conduit: standard urinary diversion for elderly patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Khurram M Siddiqui; Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Association of benign prostatic hyperplasia and subsequent risk of bladder cancer: an Asian population cohort study.

Authors:  Chu-Wen Fang; Cheng-Hsi Liao; Shih-Chi Wu; Chih-Hsin Muo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [Influence of older age on survival after radical cystectomy due to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: survival analysis of a German multi-centre study after curative treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder].

Authors:  M May; H-M Fritsche; C Gilfrich; S Brookman-May; M Burger; W Otto; C Bolenz; L Trojan; E Herrmann; M S Michel; C Wülfing; A Tiemann; S C Müller; J Ellinger; A Buchner; C G Stief; D Tilki; W F Wieland; T Höfner; M Hohenfellner; A Haferkamp; J Roigas; O Müller; P Bretschneider-Ehrenberg; M Zacharias; S Gunia; P J Bastian
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Partial cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: Practice patterns and outcomes in the general population.

Authors:  Michael J Leveridge; D Robert Siemens; Jason P Izard; Xuejiao Wei; Christopher M Booth
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  [Cystectomy in the elderly patient].

Authors:  G Bartsch; K Gust; S Vallo; C Bartsch; I Tsaur; J Mani; A Haferkamp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.