Literature DB >> 18042328

Dual implantation of penile and sphincter implants in the post-prostatectomy patient.

Rajeev Kumar1, Ajay Nehra.   

Abstract

Despite major improvement in surgical techniques for radical pelvic surgery, including radical prostatectomy, major quality-of-life issues persist, such as postoperative erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence. These two conditions have many common etiologies and often occur in the same patient. Patients with either of these conditions fail initial conservative or minimally invasive therapy and become candidates for prosthetic implants, such as artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis. In the past three decades, there have been significant improvements in the mechanical properties of these devices, their functional capabilities, and surgical implantation techniques. Studies once suggested that implantation of both devices in one patient could lead to failure, but recent literature proves that patients benefit from simultaneous dual implantation. Specific benefits relate to shorter surgery time, with potentially lower infection rates. In this manuscript, we review the indications, techniques, merits, and safety of simultaneous dual implantation of the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis in the post-radical prostatectomy patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18042328     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-007-0052-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  20 in total

Review 1.  Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence: the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantation.

Authors:  D K Montague; K W Angermeier
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Cost and time benefits of dual implantation of inflatable penile and artificial urinary sphincter prosthetics by single incision.

Authors:  Clay L Sellers; Allen F Morey; LeRoy A Jones
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Preoperative erectile function is one predictor for post prostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  S Wille; A Heidenreich; R Hofmann; U Engelmann
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.696

4.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Urinary incontinence and voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy (prospective urodynamic study).

Authors:  Attila Majoros; Dietmar Bach; Attila Keszthelyi; Antal Hamvas; Imre Romics
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Long-term results with the Kaufman prosthesis.

Authors:  S D Graham; C C Carson; E E Anderson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings.

Authors:  M A Ficazzola; V W Nitti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The susceptibility of total joint replacement to hematogenous infection in the early postoperative period: an experimental study in the rabbit.

Authors:  G Blomgren; U Lindgren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions.

Authors:  S K Wilson; J R Delk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Impact of anatomical radical prostatectomy on urinary continence.

Authors:  M S Steiner; R A Morton; P C Walsh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  2D and 3D T2-weighted MR sequences for the assessment of neurovascular bundle changes after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy with erectile function correlation.

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Alessandro Sciarra; Marcello Osimani; Danilo Lisi; Mauro Ciccariello; Stefano Salciccia; Vincenzo Gentile; Franco Di Silverio; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients.

Authors:  Robert J Carrasquillo; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Dual implantation of artificial urinary sphincter and inflatable penile prostheses for concurrent male urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Tariq F Al-Shaiji
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-11-17

4.  Management of end-stage erectile dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy by simultaneous dual implantation using a single trans-scrotal incision: surgical technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Estefanía Linares Espinós; Ignacio Moncada; Luis Del Portillo; Joaquín Carballido
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Updates in penile prosthesis infections.

Authors:  Amanda R Swanton; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.