Literature DB >> 7861509

Inflatable penile implant infection: predisposing factors and treatment suggestions.

S K Wilson1, J R Delk.   

Abstract

A retrospective review of 1,337 consecutive inflatable prosthesis implantations was done to detect predisposing factors for infection. Operations were performed by the same team during a 7-year period. Of the procedures 823 were primary implantations, while the remaining 514 were either revisions (mechanical failure, iatrogenic causes or patient dissatisfaction), salvage operations or removals for infection. The etiology of impotence as a predisposition for infection in primary implantations was significant for spinal cord injury (9% of the cases) and steroid use (50%). Diabetes had a statistically insignificant 3% risk of infection, with all other causes having a 1% infection rate. A total of 428 revisions was performed with an overall infection rate of 10%. Rates of infection ranged from 8% in nondiabetics to 18% in diabetics requiring revision. Staphylococcus species were the most commonly cultured organisms. Salvage operations (29 cases) of several types were attempted for infected prostheses. Our results with salvage were poor and we currently routinely remove the entire prosthesis for infection except in cases of urethral erosion of 1 cylinder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7861509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  42 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Penile implant infections: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Minimizing Penile Implant Infection: A Literature Review of Patient and Surgical Factors.

Authors:  Bradley Holland; Tobias Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  The role of penile prosthetic surgery in the modern management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  S Jain; A Bhojwani; T R Terry
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  A technique for improved skin isolation and a more visible operative field during penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  N A Faure Walker; D Eldred-Evans; S Willis; P K Hegarty
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Significance of biofilm for the prosthetic surgeon.

Authors:  R Charles Welliver; Brittney L Hanerhoff; Gerard D Henry; Tobias S Köhler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 8.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients.

Authors:  Robert J Carrasquillo; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection.

Authors:  M Cakan; F Demirel; O Karabacak; F Yalçinkaya; U Altuğ
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.