Literature DB >> 7108045

Normal hearing thresholds for clicks.

D R Stapells, T W Picton, A D Smith.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the normal hearing thresholds for clicks and assesses the effects on these thresholds of varying the duration of the listening period and the presentation rate, polarity, and symmetry of the clicks. There were no significant changes in thresholds as the listening period decreased from 2s to 300 mg. There was, however, a 2.5 dB increase in threshold at the listening period decreased from 300 to 100 ms. Increase stimulus presentation rate from 5 to 80/s decreased threshold 4.5 dB per tenfold change in rate. There were no significant differences in threshold between rarefaction and condensation clicks. The average threshold obtained from 40 normal young adults using 100-microseconds square-wave clicks presented through a TDH-49 earphone at 10/s was 36.4-dB peak SPL or 29.9 peak equivalent SPL. Neither peak SPL nor peak equivalent SPL measurements gave consistent thresholds for clicks with different degrees of symmetry. A root-mean-square measure of the pressure over the initial millisecond-SPL(1 ms)-gave a threshold of 25.6 dB. This SPL(1ms) measure of threshold proved to be far more consistent for clicks with different degrees of symmetry than either the peak SPL or the peak equivalent SPL measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7108045     DOI: 10.1121/1.388026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Auditory-evoked evasive manoeuvres in free-flying locusts and moths.

Authors:  J W Dawson; W Kutsch; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats.

Authors:  M W Holderied; O von Helversen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear.

Authors:  Matthew E Jackson; Navdeep S Asi; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Auditory-based defence against gleaning bats in neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Hannah M ter Hofstede; Elisabeth K V Kalko; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Single-parameter power law psychophysics of auditory numerosity and the psychological moment hypothesis.

Authors:  G H Robinson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-04

6.  Hawkmoths produce anti-bat ultrasound.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Nickolay I Hristov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Echo SPL influences the ranging performance of the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  A Denzinger; H U Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Variability in echolocation call intensity in a community of horseshoe bats: a role for resource partitioning or communication?

Authors:  Maike Schuchmann; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Organization and trade-off of spectro-temporal tuning properties of duration-tuned neurons in the mammalian inferior colliculus.

Authors:  James A Morrison; Faranak Farzan; Thane Fremouw; Riziq Sayegh; Ellen Covey; Paul A Faure
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.