Literature DB >> 17345101

The allometry of echolocation call frequencies of insectivorous bats: why do some species deviate from the pattern?

David S Jacobs1, Robert M R Barclay, Maryalice H Walker.   

Abstract

The peak echolocation frequency of insectivorous bats generally declines as body size increases. However, there are notable exceptions to this rule, with some species, such as Rhinolophus clivosus, having a higher than expected peak frequency for their body size. Such deviations from allometry may be associated with partitioning of foraging habitat (the foraging habitat hypothesis) or insect prey (the prey detection hypothesis). Alternatively, the deviations may be associated with the partitioning of sonar frequency bands to allow effective communication in a social context (the acoustic communication hypothesis). We tested the predictions of these hypotheses through comparisons at the family, clade and species level, using species of rhinolophids in general and R. clivosus, a species with a wide distribution, as a specific test case. We compared the wing parameters, echolocation frequency and ecology of R. clivosus to those of the sympatric R. capensis. Rhinolophus clivosus has a much higher echolocation frequency than predicted from its wing loading or body mass. Furthermore, contrary to the predictions of the foraging habitat hypothesis, we found no difference in foraging habitat between R. clivosus and R. capensis. The size range of insect prey taken by the two species also overlapped almost completely, contrary to the prey detection hypothesis. On the other hand, the variation of echolocation frequencies around the allometric relationship for rhinolophids was smaller than that for Myotis spp., supporting the prediction of the acoustic communication hypothesis. We thus propose that the relatively high peak frequency of R. clivosus is the result of partitioning of sonar frequency bands to minimize the ambiguity of echolocation calls during social interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17345101     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0679-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.298


  7 in total

1.  Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species.

Authors:  Björn M Siemers; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Auditory adaptations for prey capture in echolocating bats.

Authors:  G Neuweiler
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Resource partitioning of sonar frequency bands in rhinolophoid bats.

Authors:  Klaus-Gerhard Heller; Otto V Helversen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Resource partitioning in rhinolophoid bats revisited.

Authors:  T Kingston; G Jones; A Zubaid; T H Kunz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Harmonic-hopping in Wallacea's bats.

Authors:  Tigga Kingston; Stephen J Rossiter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Substrate-gleaning versus aerial-hawking: plasticity in the foraging and echolocation behaviour of the long-eared bat, Myotis evotis.

Authors:  P A Faure; R M Barclay
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Scaling of echolocation call parameters in bats.

Authors:  G Jones
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total
  23 in total

Review 1.  The communicative potential of bat echolocation pulses.

Authors:  Gareth Jones; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The relative influence of competition and prey defences on the trophic structure of animalivorous bat ensembles.

Authors:  M Corrie Schoeman; David S Jacobs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Morphological correlates of echolocation frequency in the endemic Cape horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus capensis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae).

Authors:  Lizelle J Odendaal; David S Jacobs
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Variability in echolocation call intensity in a community of horseshoe bats: a role for resource partitioning or communication?

Authors:  Maike Schuchmann; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ignoring the irrelevant: auditory tolerance of audible but innocuous sounds in the bat-detecting ears of moths.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; David S Jacobs
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-11-22

6.  Taxonomic implications of geographical variation in Rhinolophus affinis (Chiroptera: Rhinolophidae) in mainland Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Saveng Ith; Sara Bumrungsri; Neil M Furey; Paul Jj Bates; Monwadee Wonglapsuwan; Faisal Ali Anwarali Khan; Vu Dinh Thong; Pipat Soisook; Chutamas Satasook; Nikky M Thomas
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  What mechanism of niche segregation allows the coexistence of sympatric sibling rhinolophid bats?

Authors:  Egoitz Salsamendi; Inazio Garin; Inmaculada Arostegui; Urtzi Goiti; Joxerra Aihartza
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Four new bat species (Rhinolophus hildebrandtii complex) reflect Plio-Pleistocene divergence of dwarfs and giants across an Afromontane archipelago.

Authors:  Peter J Taylor; Samantha Stoffberg; Ara Monadjem; Martinus Corrie Schoeman; Julian Bayliss; Fenton P D Cotterill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches.

Authors:  Daniela A Schmieder; Hugo A Benítez; Ivailo M Borissov; Carmelo Fruciano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Phenotypic convergence in genetically distinct lineages of a Rhinolophus species complex (Mammalia, Chiroptera).

Authors:  David S Jacobs; Hassan Babiker; Anna Bastian; Teresa Kearney; Rowen van Eeden; Jacqueline M Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.