Literature DB >> 18035642

Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Kim-Phuong L Vu1.   

Abstract

The Simon effect refers to the fact that for tasks in which stimulus location is irrelevant and a nonspatial attribute is relevant, responses are typically faster when stimulus and response locations correspond than when they do not. Two experiments examined the influence of prior practice with an incompatible relevant spatial mapping on the Simon effect as a function of the dimension (vertical or horizontal) along which the stimuli and responses varied in practice and transfer sessions. With 72 practice trials, the Simon effect in the transfer session was eliminated only when the spatial dimension was horizontal for both practice and transfer. With 600 practice trials, the Simon effect was eliminated for all combinations of practice and transfer dimensions, with noncorresponding responses showing an advantage when the dimension was horizontal for both practice and transfer. Within-dimension transfer effects for the horizontal dimension after a small amount of practice can be attributed to reactivation of specific stimulus-response associations defined for the practice task. However, the between-dimension transfer effects evident after a larger amount of practice cannot be explained in this manner and suggest that the subjects acquired a general procedure of responding opposite to the stimulus location.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035642     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.

Authors:  K P Vu; R W Proctor; D F Pick
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

2.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.

Authors:  M M Botvinick; T S Braver; D M Barch; C S Carter; J D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Transfer effects of incompatible location-relevant mappings on a subsequent visual or auditory simon task.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor; Peter Urcuioli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

4.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; Jonathan D Cohen; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Dynamic aspects of stimulus-response correspondence: evidence for two mechanisms involved in the Simon effect.

Authors:  Katrin Wiegand; Edmund Wascher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

7.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing.

Authors:  J R Simon; A P Rudell
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1967-06

Review 8.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.

Authors:  S Kornblum; T Hasbroucq; A Osman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  A computational model of the Simon effect.

Authors:  M Zorzi; C Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1995

10.  The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.

Authors:  M Tagliabue; M Zorzi; C Umiltà; F Bassignani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  11 in total

1.  The influence of working memory load on the Simon effect.

Authors:  Xiao Zhao; Antao Chen; Robert West
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  Influence of short incompatible practice on the Simon effect: transfer along the vertical dimension and across vertical and horizontal dimensions.

Authors:  Erick F Q Conde; Roberto Sena Fraga-Filho; Allan Pablo Lameira; Daniel C Mograbi; Lucia Riggio; Luiz G Gawryszewski
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Role of stimulus and response feature overlap in between-task logical recoding.

Authors:  Barbara Treccani; Luca Ronconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-12-08

4.  Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Sandro Rubichi; Elena Gherri; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

5.  A test of the embodied simulation theory of object perception: potentiation of responses to artifacts and animals.

Authors:  Heath E Matheson; Nicole C White; Patricia A McMullen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-07-20

6.  Transfer of learning in choice reactions: The roles of stimulus type, response mode, and set-level compatibility.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Jing Chen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

7.  Smooth criminal: convicted rule-breakers show reduced cognitive conflict during deliberate rule violations.

Authors:  Aiste Jusyte; Roland Pfister; Sarah V Mayer; Katharina A Schwarz; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Michael Schönenberg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-08-27

8.  Vertically arrayed stimuli and responses: transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to Simon task occurs regardless of response-device orientation.

Authors:  Qi Zhong; Aiping Xiong; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.

Authors:  Marianna Ambrosecchia; Barbara F M Marino; Luiz G Gawryszewski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Practice effects vs. transfer effects in the Simon task.

Authors:  Stefania D'Ascenzo; Luisa Lugli; Roberto Nicoletti; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.