Literature DB >> 29103132

Vertically arrayed stimuli and responses: transfer of incompatible spatial mapping to Simon task occurs regardless of response-device orientation.

Qi Zhong1,2, Aiping Xiong2, Kim-Phuong L Vu3, Robert W Proctor4.   

Abstract

Conde et al. (Exp Brain Res 233:3313-3321, 2015) found that the Simon effect for vertically arrayed stimuli and responses was reduced after 100 prior practice trials with an incompatible mapping of the stimulus locations and responses. This finding was contrary to Vu's (Mem Cognit 35:1463-1471, 2007) finding of no transfer effect with 72 trials of prior practice. Conde et al. proposed that the different results were due to their responses being coded as top and bottom in the frontal plane, whereas Vu's were coded as far and near in the transverse plane. We conducted four experiments to test this possibility in which participants responded with keypresses using their thumbs on a numeric keypad held vertically (upright in the frontal plane) or horizontally (flat in the transverse plane). Experiment 1 showed that, without any prior practice, a similar sized Simon effect was obtained when the response device was oriented in the transverse plane as when it was oriented in the frontal plane. In Experiments 2 and 3 participants performed with the same device orientation in the incompatible practice and Simon transfer tasks, with orientation manipulated between-subjects in the former and within-subjects in the latter. The Simon effect was reduced in both cases, with no significant difference in transfer effect for transverse and frontal planes. In Experiment 4, the device orientation differed between the incompatible practice and Simon transfer tasks, and the Simon effect was reduced similarly across both response-device orientations. Thus, the differences between Conde et al.'s and Vu's findings cannot be attributed to the response-device orientation. Our results are consistent with the view that people code response locations in the transverse plane as top and bottom, rather than far and near, in agreement with the terminology of "top row" and "bottom row" for computer keyboards.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incompatible practice; Stimulus-response compatibility; Transfer effect; Vertical simon effect

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29103132     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5116-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  22 in total

1.  Vertical versus horizontal spatial compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.

Authors:  K P Vu; R W Proctor; D F Pick
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2000

2.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes.

Authors:  P M FITTS; R L DEININGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-12

3.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Peter Wiihr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Co-occurrence of sequential and practice effects in the Simon task: Evidence for two independent mechanisms affecting response selection.

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Sandro Rubichi; Elena Gherri; Roberto Nicoletti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

5.  Modulation of the affordance effect through transfer of learning.

Authors:  Giovanni Ottoboni; Cristina Iani; Alessia Tessari; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

7.  Movement compatibility for configurations of displays located in three cardinal orientations and ipsilateral, contralateral and overhead controls.

Authors:  Alan H S Chan; Errol R Hoffmann
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.

Authors:  Maddalena Marini; Cristina Iani; Roberto Nicoletti; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

9.  The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect.

Authors:  M Tagliabue; M Zorzi; C Umiltà; F Bassignani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Independent effects of 2-D and 3-D locations of stimuli in a 3-D display on response speed in a Simon task.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Umemura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.