Literature DB >> 26645824

Role of stimulus and response feature overlap in between-task logical recoding.

Barbara Treccani1, Luca Ronconi2, Carlo Umiltà2.   

Abstract

The reversal logical recoding rule (i.e., "respond opposite") induced by an incompatible task (e.g., a task requiring to respond to red or green stimuli by pressing a key of the alternative colour compared to that of the stimulus) can be transferred to another task when the two tasks are combined in a task-switching paradigm. When the task to which the rule is transferred is a Simon task, this causes the disappearance of the typical advantage for responses that spatially correspond to the stimulus, or even results in an advantage for spatially noncorresponding responses. The present study aimed at investigating whether the transferred rule is independent of the specific stimulus and response dimensions for which it has been created. Previous studies suggest that when a Simon task is coupled with a colour incompatible task, the Simon effect may disappear or reverse even when stimuli in the two tasks, apart from being both visual and appearing on the same computer screen, have no other features in common. Results of the present study corroborate the hypothesis that feature overlap between stimuli is not necessary for the between-task transfer of the logical rule. However, an overlap between the representations of responses appears to be crucial. No modulation of the Simon effect was observed when the Simon task required bimanual responses while the colour-compatibility task required either vocal responses or responses executed with the two feet. In contrast, we did observe such a modulation when the discriminative response dimension and the effectors/response device were the same in the two tasks, even though these two tasks provided for different stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645824     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0728-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  15 in total

1.  Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.

Authors:  R W Proctor; C H Lu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?

Authors:  Daniela Mapelli; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07

3.  Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus.

Authors:  Barbara Treccani; Carlo Umiltà; Mariaelena Tagliabue
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects.

Authors:  Wim Notebaert; Wim Gevers; Tom Verguts; Wim Fias
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Influences on the Simon effect of prior practice with spatially incompatible mappings: transfer within and between horizontal and vertical dimensions.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

6.  Logical recoding of S-R rules can reverse the effects of spatial S-R correspondence.

Authors:  Peter Wühr; Rupert Biebl
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Transfer of learning in choice reactions: contributions of specific and general components of manual responses.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-10-25

8.  Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: evidence from psychophysiological studies.

Authors:  M Eimer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Between-task transfer of learning from spatial compatibility to a color stroop task.

Authors:  Maddalena Marini; Cristina Iani; Roberto Nicoletti; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

10.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  1 in total

1.  Practice effects vs. transfer effects in the Simon task.

Authors:  Stefania D'Ascenzo; Luisa Lugli; Roberto Nicoletti; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-08-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.