Literature DB >> 18035541

Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment.

E A Ooms1, H M Zonderland, M J C Eijkemans, M Kriege, B Mahdavian Delavary, C W Burger, A C Ansink.   

Abstract

Our objective was to determine the interobserver variability of breast density assessment according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and to examine potential associations between breast density and risk factors for breast cancer. Four experienced breast radiologists received instructions regarding the use of BI-RADS and they assessed 57 mammograms into BI-RADS density categories of 1-4. The weighted kappa values for breast density between pairs of observers were 0.84 (A, B) (almost perfect agreement); 0.75 (A, C), 0.74 (A, D), 0.71 (B, C), 0.77 (B, D), 0.65 (C, D) (substantial agreement). The weighted overall kappa, measured by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.85). Body mass index was inversely associated with high breast density. In conclusion, overall interobserver agreement in mammographic interpretation of breast density is substantial and therefore, the BI-RADS classification for breast density is useful for standardization in a multicentre study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035541     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  42 in total

1.  Observer Variability of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Lexicon for Mammography.

Authors:  Zehra H Adibelli; Ruken Ergenc; Ozgur Oztekin; Suheyla Ecevit; Gokhan Unal; Yusuf Abal
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and change in mammographic density: a cohort study using pharmacy records on over 29,000 postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Mary Beth Terry; Diana S M Buist; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Tamarra M James-Todd; Yuyan Liao
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  The Effect of Atorvastatin on Breast Cancer Biomarkers in High-Risk Women.

Authors:  YongLi Ji; Tiffany Rounds; Abigail Crocker; Betsy Sussman; Russell C Hovey; Fonda Kingsley; Hyman B Muss; Judy E Garber; Marie E Wood
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2016-02-23

4.  Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Lynda C Ikejimba; Predrag R Bakic; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast density evaluation using spectral mammography, radiologist reader assessment, and segmentation techniques: a retrospective study based on left and right breast comparison.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Huanjun Ding; Stephen Feig
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Postmortem validation of breast density using dual-energy mammography.

Authors:  Sabee Molloi; Justin L Ducote; Huanjun Ding; Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Convolutional Neural Network Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Mammographic Dataset.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Jenika Karcich; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Charlotte C Gard; Diana L Miglioretti; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Berta A Geller; Tracy L Onega
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  An Investigation into the Consistency in Mammographic Density Identification by Radiologists: Effect of Radiologist Expertise and Mammographic Appearance.

Authors:  Yanpeng Li; Patrick C Brennan; Warwick Lee; Carolyn Nickson; Mariusz W Pietrzyk; Elaine A Ryan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density.

Authors:  Anne Marie McCarthy; Brad M Keller; Lauren M Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Marie Synnestvedt; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.