BACKGROUND: Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) has been associated with a decrease in breast cancer risk, but it is unknown if they also reduce mammographic density, a strong intermediate marker of breast cancer risk. METHODS: We investigated NSAID use and mammographic density in 29,284 postmenopausal women who had two screening mammograms at Group Health in Seattle. We used pharmacy records to classify women as NSAID nonusers, continuers, initiators, or discontinuers based on use between the two mammograms and nine separate prescription and nonprescription NSAID classes. Using unordered polytomous logistic regression methods, we modeled the odds ratio (OR) of staying not dense, decreasing density, or increasing density relative to remaining dense based on Breast Imaging Reporting Data System classification of density. RESULTS: There was no association with density change from initiation or continuation of NSAIDs. However, both initiators and continuers of any NSAIDs were more likely to stay not dense than stay dense [OR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.04-1.20; OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49, respectively]. This association with staying not dense for initiators and continuers of any NSAID use was observed primarily among women ages <65 years at first mammogram (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.36; OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.14-1.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of NSAID use did not reduce mammographic density over the short term. Continuers of NSAID use were more likely to stay not dense compared with nonusers, suggesting that it is plausible that longer-term use of NSAIDs may be needed to reduce density.
BACKGROUND: Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) has been associated with a decrease in breast cancer risk, but it is unknown if they also reduce mammographic density, a strong intermediate marker of breast cancer risk. METHODS: We investigated NSAID use and mammographic density in 29,284 postmenopausal women who had two screening mammograms at Group Health in Seattle. We used pharmacy records to classify women as NSAID nonusers, continuers, initiators, or discontinuers based on use between the two mammograms and nine separate prescription and nonprescription NSAID classes. Using unordered polytomous logistic regression methods, we modeled the odds ratio (OR) of staying not dense, decreasing density, or increasing density relative to remaining dense based on Breast Imaging Reporting Data System classification of density. RESULTS: There was no association with density change from initiation or continuation of NSAIDs. However, both initiators and continuers of any NSAIDs were more likely to stay not dense than stay dense [OR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.04-1.20; OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.49, respectively]. This association with staying not dense for initiators and continuers of any NSAID use was observed primarily among women ages <65 years at first mammogram (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.36; OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.14-1.93, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of NSAID use did not reduce mammographic density over the short term. Continuers of NSAID use were more likely to stay not dense compared with nonusers, suggesting that it is plausible that longer-term use of NSAIDs may be needed to reduce density.
Authors: S K Boolbol; A J Dannenberg; A Chadburn; C Martucci; X J Guo; J T Ramonetti; M Abreu-Goris; H L Newmark; M L Lipkin; J J DeCosse; M M Bertagnolli Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1996-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: N Bjurstam; L Björneld; S W Duffy; T C Smith; E Cahlin; O Eriksson; L O Hafström; H Lingaas; J Mattsson; S Persson; C M Rudenstam; J Säve-Söderbergh Journal: Cancer Date: 1997-12-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: S H Taplin; M T Mandelson; C Anderman; E White; R S Thompson; D Timlin; E H Wagner Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: G A Greendale; B A Reboussin; A Sie; H R Singh; L K Olson; O Gatewood; L W Bassett; C Wasilauskas; T Bush; E Barrett-Connor Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1999-02-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anne McTiernan; C Y Wang; Bess Sorensen; Liren Xiao; Diana S M Buist; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Emily White; Mary Anne Rossing; John Potter; Nicole Urban Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Lusine Yaghjyan; Volker Mai; Xuefeng Wang; Maria Ukhanova; Maximiliano Tagliamonte; Yessica C Martinez; Shannan N Rich; Kathleen M Egan Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2021-03-27 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Teofilia Acheampong; Erica J Lee Argov; Mary Beth Terry; Carmen B Rodriguez; Mariangela Agovino; Ying Wei; Shweta Alithat; Parisa Tehranifar Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 2.532
Authors: Xuan Sun; Danielle J Glynn; Leigh J Hodson; Cecilia Huo; Kara Britt; Erik W Thompson; Lucy Woolford; Andreas Evdokiou; Jeffrey W Pollard; Sarah A Robertson; Wendy V Ingman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Gertraud Maskarinec; Dan Ju; Jaimie Fong; David Horio; Owen Chan; Lenora W M Loo; Brenda Y Hernandez Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-11-29 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Patricia A Thompson; Chuan Huang; Jie Yang; Betsy C Wertheim; Denise Roe; Xiaoyue Zhang; Jie Ding; Pavani Chalasani; Christina Preece; Jessica Martinez; H-H Sherry Chow; Alison T Stopeck Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yunan Han; Chee Teik Lee; Shuai Xu; Xiaoyue Mi; Courtnie R Phillip; Ana S Salazar; Malika Rakhmankulova; Adetunji T Toriola Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Braden Miller; Hunter Chalfant; Alexandra Thomas; Elizabeth Wellberg; Christina Henson; Molly W McNally; William E Grizzle; Ajay Jain; Lacey R McNally Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 5.923