Björn Barenius1, Magnus Forssblad, Björn Engström, Karl Eriksson. 1. Section of Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, 11883, Stockholm, Sweden. bjorn.barenius@sodersjukhuset.se
Abstract
PURPOSE: To restore functional stability of the knee joint and to prevent secondary injuries to the cartilage and menisci are the main goals of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Functional stability can be assessed by health-related quality of life questionnaires, but characterising differences between a satisfactory and non-satisfactory result can be challenging. METHODS: The aim of this study based on the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register was to find predictors for a satisfactory result defined as functional recovery (FR) or a non-satisfactory result defined as treatment failure (TF), with special emphasis on waiting time before surgery and additional injuries. FR was defined as a Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) above: 90 for Pain, 84 for Symptoms, 91 for ADL, 80 for Sport/Rec and 81 for quality of life (QoL). TF was defined as a KOOS, QoL < 44. RESULTS: A complete KOOS was available for 41.4 % of a cohort of 8,584 patients 2 years after the ACL reconstruction. Of all patients, 19.7 % were FR and 28.9 % were TF. Male gender was a predictor for FR. Previous surgery of the menisci and a patella graft was predictors for TF and negative predictors for FR. A medial meniscus suture or resection at the time of reconstruction was a predictor for TF. Waiting time was a predictor for medial meniscus and cartilage injury at the time of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Functional recovery after an ACL reconstruction can be achieved; gender and additional injuries are important predictors for a functional recovery. To time surgery early, that is, before recurring giving ways has occurred is essential to decrease additional injuries and increase the chance of functional recovery.
PURPOSE: To restore functional stability of the knee joint and to prevent secondary injuries to the cartilage and menisci are the main goals of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Functional stability can be assessed by health-related quality of life questionnaires, but characterising differences between a satisfactory and non-satisfactory result can be challenging. METHODS: The aim of this study based on the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register was to find predictors for a satisfactory result defined as functional recovery (FR) or a non-satisfactory result defined as treatment failure (TF), with special emphasis on waiting time before surgery and additional injuries. FR was defined as a Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) above: 90 for Pain, 84 for Symptoms, 91 for ADL, 80 for Sport/Rec and 81 for quality of life (QoL). TF was defined as a KOOS, QoL < 44. RESULTS: A complete KOOS was available for 41.4 % of a cohort of 8,584 patients 2 years after the ACL reconstruction. Of all patients, 19.7 % were FR and 28.9 % were TF. Male gender was a predictor for FR. Previous surgery of the menisci and a patella graft was predictors for TF and negative predictors for FR. A medial meniscus suture or resection at the time of reconstruction was a predictor for TF. Waiting time was a predictor for medial meniscus and cartilage injury at the time of reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Functional recovery after an ACL reconstruction can be achieved; gender and additional injuries are important predictors for a functional recovery. To time surgery early, that is, before recurring giving ways has occurred is essential to decrease additional injuries and increase the chance of functional recovery.
Authors: Jonas Isberg; Eva Faxén; Gauti Laxdal; Bengt I Eriksson; Johan Kärrholm; Jon Karlsson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Carina A Thorstensson; L Stefan Lohmander; Richard B Frobell; Ewa M Roos; Rachael Gooberman-Hill Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Pia Thomeé; Peter Währborg; Mats Börjesson; Roland Thomeé; B I Eriksson; Jon Karlsson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2007-11-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: J Kristopher Ware; Brett D Owens; Matthew R Akelman; Naga Padmini Karamchedu; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Braden C Fleming Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Brooke E Patterson; Adam G Culvenor; Christian J Barton; Ali Guermazi; Joshua J Stefanik; Kay M Crossley Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Matthew P Ithurburn; Alex R Altenburger; Staci Thomas; Timothy E Hewett; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-09-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Matthew P Ithurburn; Andrew M Zbojniewicz; Staci Thomas; Kevin D Evans; Michael L Pennell; Robert A Magnussen; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Matthew P Ithurburn; Mark V Paterno; Staci Thomas; Michael L Pennell; Kevin D Evans; Robert A Magnussen; Laura C Schmitt Journal: Knee Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: John Reinholdsson; Jesper Kraus-Schmitz; Magnus Forssblad; Gunnar Edman; Martina Byttner; Anders Stålman Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-01-02 Impact factor: 4.342