Literature DB >> 18032090

Further examination of modifying patient-preferred movement and alignment strategies in patients with low back pain during symptomatic tests.

Linda R Van Dillen1, Katrina S Maluf, Shirley A Sahrmann.   

Abstract

Our purpose was to examine the effect of modifying symptomatic movement and alignment tests in a sample of people with LBP referred to physical therapy. Fifty-one patients (19 males, 32 females; mean age 37+/-10.59 yr) with LBP and a mean Oswestry Disability Index score of 34+/-18% were examined. The examination included 28 primary tests in which patients used their preferred movement or alignment strategy and reported symptoms. Symptomatic tests were followed by a secondary test in which the patient's strategy was standardly modified to correct the spinal alignment or movement that occurred with the primary test. Symptoms and directions of movement or alignment modified were recorded. For 82% of the secondary tests, the majority of the patients' symptoms improved. For 54% of the secondary tests, some patients required modification of more than one direction of movement or alignment to eliminate symptoms. The findings suggest that the modifications described are generalizable across a number of tests with a moderately involved group of patients, and for individual tests there is variability in the numbers and directions of movements or alignments that appear to contribute to symptoms. Information obtained from the modifications is important because it can be used to confirm the patient's LBP classification and, within the context of the examination, immediately be used to teach the patient strategies to change movements and positions that appear to be contributing to his LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18032090      PMCID: PMC2659590          DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2007.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  30 in total

Review 1.  Tissue adaptation to physical stress: a proposed "Physical Stress Theory" to guide physical therapist practice, education, and research.

Authors:  Michael J Mueller; Katrina S Maluf
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-04

2.  Gender differences in pattern of hip and lumbopelvic rotation in people with low back pain.

Authors:  Sara P Gombatto; David R Collins; Shirley A Sahrmann; Jack R Engsberg; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior.

Authors:  D V Cicchetti; S A Sparrow
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1981-09

4.  Accuracy of recall of usual pain intensity in back pain patients.

Authors:  Jennifer E Bolton
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Effect of active limb movements on symptoms in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  L R Van Dillen; S A Sahrmann; B J Norton; C A Caldwell; D Fleming; M K McDonnell; N J Bloom
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Use of a classification system to guide nonsurgical management of a patient with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  K S Maluf; S A Sahrmann; L R Van Dillen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-11

7.  A new approach to the low-back physical examination. Behavioral assessment of mechanical signs.

Authors:  K F Spratt; T R Lehmann; J N Weinstein; H A Sayre
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain.

Authors:  Audrey Long; Ron Donelson; Tak Fung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of classification-based physical therapy with therapy based on clinical practice guidelines for patients with acute low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Anthony Delitto; Richard E Erhard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Gender-related differences in prevalence of lumbopelvic region movement impairments in people with low back pain.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  29 in total

1.  Effects of experimentally induced low back pain on the sit-to-stand movement and electroencephalographic contingent negative variation.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Chie Yaguchi; Chizuru Kaida; Mariko Irei; Masami Naka; Sharon M Henry; Katsuo Fujiwara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Is lumbar lordosis related to low back pain development during prolonged standing?

Authors:  Christopher J Sorensen; Barbara J Norton; Jack P Callaghan; Ching-Ting Hwang; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-01-14

3.  The effect of within-session instruction on lumbopelvic motion during a lower limb movement in people with and people without low back pain.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Barbara J Norton; Catherine E Lang; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2010-06-02

4.  The reliability and validity of the Saliba Postural Classification System.

Authors:  Cristiana Kahl Collins; Vicky Saliba Johnson; Ellen M Godwin; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-07

5.  Asymmetry of lumbopelvic movement patterns during active hip abduction is a risk factor for low back pain development during standing.

Authors:  Christopher J Sorensen; Molly B Johnson; Barbara J Norton; Jack P Callaghan; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Sex differences in lumbopelvic movement patterns during hip medial rotation in people with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Shannon L Hoffman; Molly B Johnson; Dequan Zou; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Examination of the Lumbar Movement Pattern during a Clinical Test and a Functional Activity Test in People with and without Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Andrej V Marich; Ching-Ting Hwang; Christopher J Sorensen; Linda R van Dillen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Activity characteristics and movement patterns in people with and people without low back pain who participate in rotation-related sports.

Authors:  Ruth L Chimenti; Sara A Scholtes; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 1.931

9.  Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Sara P Gombatto; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  The inter-tester reliability of physical therapists classifying low back pain problems based on the movement system impairment classification system.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.