UNLABELLED: A rationale for a new approach to the low-back physical examination was developed. A set of 21 tests, 17 assessing organic and four assessing nonorganic signs, were organized into an examination according to specified criteria, and the reliability of the patient-reported and examiner-observed measures within the examination assessed. Primary outcome measures included patient reports of their pain location, aggravation and examiner-observed pain behaviors resulting from the maneuvers. Two pain behavior composites, conceptualized as outcome measures, were developed, one based on the 17 organic tests and one based on the four nonorganic tests. DESIGN: The reliability of the physical examination was assessed using a short-term test-retest paradigm. Three raters, two experienced orthopaedic surgeons and an RN with no previous experience in administering physical examinations were trained in the examination methods. Patients were assigned to one of three rater pairs and examined twice within a single day. During each examination both raters evaluated each patient; however, rater role as examiner or observer was reversed across examination. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were examined. Average times of 13.9 and 11.6 minutes were required to complete examinations 1 and 2, respectively. In addition, the time required to complete the examination decreased as the examiners became more familiar with the procedure, suggesting that an experienced examiner would usually be able to complete the examination in approximately 10 minutes. Within-examination reliabilities for the patient-reported measures (pain location and aggravation) were universally high, as expected, since these rating required the rater only to correctly hear and code patient responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
UNLABELLED: A rationale for a new approach to the low-back physical examination was developed. A set of 21 tests, 17 assessing organic and four assessing nonorganic signs, were organized into an examination according to specified criteria, and the reliability of the patient-reported and examiner-observed measures within the examination assessed. Primary outcome measures included patient reports of their pain location, aggravation and examiner-observed pain behaviors resulting from the maneuvers. Two pain behavior composites, conceptualized as outcome measures, were developed, one based on the 17 organic tests and one based on the four nonorganic tests. DESIGN: The reliability of the physical examination was assessed using a short-term test-retest paradigm. Three raters, two experienced orthopaedic surgeons and an RN with no previous experience in administering physical examinations were trained in the examination methods. Patients were assigned to one of three rater pairs and examined twice within a single day. During each examination both raters evaluated each patient; however, rater role as examiner or observer was reversed across examination. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were examined. Average times of 13.9 and 11.6 minutes were required to complete examinations 1 and 2, respectively. In addition, the time required to complete the examination decreased as the examiners became more familiar with the procedure, suggesting that an experienced examiner would usually be able to complete the examination in approximately 10 minutes. Within-examination reliabilities for the patient-reported measures (pain location and aggravation) were universally high, as expected, since these rating required the rater only to correctly hear and code patient responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)