Literature DB >> 27744105

Asymmetry of lumbopelvic movement patterns during active hip abduction is a risk factor for low back pain development during standing.

Christopher J Sorensen1, Molly B Johnson2, Barbara J Norton3, Jack P Callaghan4, Linda R Van Dillen5.   

Abstract

An induced-pain paradigm has been used in back-healthy people to understand risk factors for developing low back pain (LBP) during prolonged standing. We examined asymmetry of lumbopelvic movement timing during a clinical test of active hip abduction in back-healthy people who developed LBP symptoms during standing (Pain Developers; PDs) compared to back-healthy people who did not develop LBP symptoms during standing (Non Pain Developers, NPDs). Participants completed the hip abduction test while movement was recorded with a motion capture system. Difference in time between start of hip and lumbopelvic movement was calculated (startdiff). PDs moved the lumbopelvic region earlier during left hip abduction than right hip abduction. There was no difference between sides in NPDs. In PDs, the amount of asymmetry was related to average symptom intensity during standing. Asymmetric lumbopelvic movement patterns may be a risk factor for LBP development during prolonged standing.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; Lumbopelvic movement; Prolonged standing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27744105      PMCID: PMC5097699          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  31 in total

1.  Perceived job demands relate to self-reported health complaints.

Authors:  Corne A M Roelen; K Jeep Schreuder; Petra C Koopmans; Johan W Groothoff
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 2.  The biomechanics of low back injury: implications on current practice in industry and the clinic.

Authors:  S M McGill
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Transient low back pain development during standing predicts future clinical low back pain in previously asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Erika Nelson-Wong; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Use of a classification system to guide nonsurgical management of a patient with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  K S Maluf; S A Sahrmann; L R Van Dillen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-11

5.  Physical load in daily life and low back problems in the general population-The MORGEN study.

Authors:  H S Picavet; J S Schouten
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Differences in lumbopelvic motion between people with and people without low back pain during two lower limb movement tests.

Authors:  Sara A Scholtes; Sara P Gombatto; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Psychological Factors Are Related to Pain Intensity in Back-Healthy People Who Develop Clinically Relevant Pain During Prolonged Standing: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Christopher J Sorensen; Steven Z George; Jack P Callaghan; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Validity of a Paradigm for Low Back Pain Symptom Development During Prolonged Standing.

Authors:  Christopher J Sorensen; Molly B Johnson; Jack P Callaghan; Steven Z George; Linda R Van Dillen
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  Prolonged standing as a precursor for the development of low back discomfort: an investigation of possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Diane E Gregory; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Is muscle co-activation a predisposing factor for low back pain development during standing? A multifactorial approach for early identification of at-risk individuals.

Authors:  Erika Nelson-Wong; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 2.368

View more
  6 in total

1.  Thirty Minutes Identified as the Threshold for Development of Pain in Low Back and Feet Regions, and Predictors of Intensity of Pain during 1-h Laboratory-Based Standing in Office Workers.

Authors:  Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero; Michelle D Smith; Sonia Pértega-Díaz; Alejandro Quintela-Del-Rio; Venerina Johnston
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes.

Authors:  Shirley Sahrmann; Daniel C Azevedo; Linda Van Dillen
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Association of low back load with low back pain during static standing.

Authors:  Tetsuya Hasegawa; Junji Katsuhira; Hiroyuki Oka; Tomoko Fujii; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The association between pelvic asymmetry and non-specific chronic low back pain as assessed by the global postural system.

Authors:  Qiuhua Yu; Huanjie Huang; Zhou Zhang; Xiaoqian Hu; Wenfeng Li; Le Li; Min Chen; Zhenwen Liang; Wai Leung Ambrose Lo; Chuhuai Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  What Psychosocial and Physical Characteristics Differentiate Office Workers Who Develop Standing-Induced Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Beatriz Rodríguez-Romero; Michelle D Smith; Alejandro Quintela-Del-Rio; Venerina Johnston
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Trunk muscle activation patterns during active hip abduction test during remission from recurrent low back pain: an observational study.

Authors:  Tadanobu Suehiro; Hiroshi Ishida; Kenichi Kobara; Hiroshi Osaka; Chiharu Kurozumi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.