OBJECTIVE: The classification of patients with low back pain (LBP) may be important for improving clinical outcomes and research efficiency. The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-tester reliability of 2 trained physical therapists to classify patients with LBP by using the standardized Movement System Impairment (MSI) classification system. The 5 proposed MSI classifications are based on the most consistent patterns of movement and alignment observed throughout the examination that correlate with the patient's symptom behavior. DESIGN: Test-retest to assess reliability SETTING: Academic healthcare center outpatient facility PARTICIPANTS: Thirty subjects (21 women and 9 men) with chronic, recurrent LBP (mean age 31.1 +/- 12.9 years) were examined independently by 2 experienced physical therapists. METHODS: Training consisted of self-study of a procedure manual, a supervised practice of examination procedures and classification rules, and discussion. Subjects were examined independently by each therapist using a test-retest design. Each therapist assigned a LBP classification upon completion of the examination. Both therapists were blinded to the other therapist's findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-tester reliability of therapists classifying the LBP problems was indexed by the percent agreement and kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Overall percent agreement on the classification assigned was 83% with kappa = 0.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.99; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Inter-tester reliability of classification of patients with LBP when therapists use a standardized clinical examination based on the MSI classification system is substantial.
OBJECTIVE: The classification of patients with low back pain (LBP) may be important for improving clinical outcomes and research efficiency. The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-tester reliability of 2 trained physical therapists to classify patients with LBP by using the standardized Movement System Impairment (MSI) classification system. The 5 proposed MSI classifications are based on the most consistent patterns of movement and alignment observed throughout the examination that correlate with the patient's symptom behavior. DESIGN: Test-retest to assess reliability SETTING: Academic healthcare center outpatient facility PARTICIPANTS: Thirty subjects (21 women and 9 men) with chronic, recurrent LBP (mean age 31.1 +/- 12.9 years) were examined independently by 2 experienced physical therapists. METHODS: Training consisted of self-study of a procedure manual, a supervised practice of examination procedures and classification rules, and discussion. Subjects were examined independently by each therapist using a test-retest design. Each therapist assigned a LBP classification upon completion of the examination. Both therapists were blinded to the other therapist's findings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inter-tester reliability of therapists classifying the LBP problems was indexed by the percent agreement and kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Overall percent agreement on the classification assigned was 83% with kappa = 0.75 (95% confidence interval = 0.51-0.99; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Inter-tester reliability of classification of patients with LBP when therapists use a standardized clinical examination based on the MSI classification system is substantial.
Authors: Sinikka Kilpikoski; Olavi Airaksinen; Markku Kankaanpää; Päivi Leminen; Tapio Videman; Markku Alen Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: L R Van Dillen; S A Sahrmann; B J Norton; C A Caldwell; D Fleming; M K McDonnell; N J Bloom Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Linda R Van Dillen; Shirley A Sahrmann; Barbara J Norton; Cheryl A Caldwell; Mary Kate McDonnell; Nancy Bloom Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Laura A Siminoff; Heather L Rogers; Allison C Waller; Sonja Harris-Haywood; Ronald M Esptein; Francesc Borrell Carrio; Gayle Gliva-McConvey; Daniel R Longo Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2011-03
Authors: Sara P Gombatto; Barbara J Norton; Shirley A Sahrmann; Michael J Strube; Linda R Van Dillen Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2013-02-10 Impact factor: 2.063