BACKGROUND: The brush biopsy technique is not only a seminal technique but also a critically discussed method for detection of oral pre-cancerous stages and manifest carcinomas. The gamma2 chain of laminin-5 and its proteolytic fragments comprise an invasion factor for many carcinomas. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the immunocytochemical presentation of the laminin gamma2 chain identifies pre-invasive or invasive squamous cells in brush biopsies. METHODS: The value-based identification of atypical epithelia was analysed in 93 consecutive brush biopsies with histopathological diagnoses: standardized haematoxylin and eosin staining; standardized immunocytochemistry: monoclonal antibodies against laminin gamma2 chain: D4B5, 4G1, detection using ChemMate and Autostainer. RESULTS: Conventional cytology did not result in any false-positive cases, i.e. atypical cells in normal, inflamed or benignly hyperproliferative mucosa (specificity, 100%), whereas immunocytochemistry revealed one false-positive case (specificity, 98%). In brush biopsies of oral squamous cell carcinomas, the following immunocytochemical patterns were possible: (1) staining of the cytoplasm, (2) banded markings between clumped carcinoma cells and (3) positive hazes surrounding atypical cells. Bacterial colonies appeared as false-positive results. Four of 27 carcinomas and one of three recurrences were not cytologically identified (sensitivity of conventional cytology, 79%). Three of the five carcinomas not identified by cytology were immunocytochemically stained with laminin gamma2 chain antibody (sensitivity of laminin gamma2 chain immunocytochemistry, 93%). The positive predictive value was 100% for conventional cytology and 97% for laminin gamma2 chain immunocytochemistry. The negative predictive value attained was 92% for conventional cytology and 97% for laminin gamma2 chain immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity level observed for method-enhanced brush cytology suggests that this technique be used as an initial diagnostic step.
BACKGROUND: The brush biopsy technique is not only a seminal technique but also a critically discussed method for detection of oral pre-cancerous stages and manifest carcinomas. The gamma2 chain of laminin-5 and its proteolytic fragments comprise an invasion factor for many carcinomas. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether the immunocytochemical presentation of the laminin gamma2 chain identifies pre-invasive or invasive squamous cells in brush biopsies. METHODS: The value-based identification of atypical epithelia was analysed in 93 consecutive brush biopsies with histopathological diagnoses: standardized haematoxylin and eosin staining; standardized immunocytochemistry: monoclonal antibodies against laminin gamma2 chain: D4B5, 4G1, detection using ChemMate and Autostainer. RESULTS: Conventional cytology did not result in any false-positive cases, i.e. atypical cells in normal, inflamed or benignly hyperproliferative mucosa (specificity, 100%), whereas immunocytochemistry revealed one false-positive case (specificity, 98%). In brush biopsies of oral squamous cell carcinomas, the following immunocytochemical patterns were possible: (1) staining of the cytoplasm, (2) banded markings between clumped carcinoma cells and (3) positive hazes surrounding atypical cells. Bacterial colonies appeared as false-positive results. Four of 27 carcinomas and one of three recurrences were not cytologically identified (sensitivity of conventional cytology, 79%). Three of the five carcinomas not identified by cytology were immunocytochemically stained with laminin gamma2 chain antibody (sensitivity of laminin gamma2 chain immunocytochemistry, 93%). The positive predictive value was 100% for conventional cytology and 97% for laminin gamma2 chain immunocytochemistry. The negative predictive value attained was 92% for conventional cytology and 97% for laminin gamma2 chain immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity level observed for method-enhanced brush cytology suggests that this technique be used as an initial diagnostic step.
Authors: O Driemel; R Dahse; A Berndt; H Pistner; S G Hakim; L Zardi; T E Reichert; H Kosmehl Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2006-11-17 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: O Driemel; M Kunkel; M Hullmann; N Kleinsasser; R Staudenmaier; U Müller-Richter; T E Reichert; H Kosmehl Journal: HNO Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 1.284