Literature DB >> 20593209

Diagnostic efficiency of differentiating small cancerous and precancerous lesions using mucosal brush smears of the oral cavity--a prospective and blinded study.

Felix Peter Koch1, Martin Kunkel, Stefan Biesterfeld, Wilfried Wagner.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of oral brush biopsy to identify early malignancy. One hundred and eighty-six brush biopsies of suspicious mucosal lesions were obtained, haematoxilin and eosin (H&E)-stained and compared with the histology of conventional excision biopsies of the same site performed concomitantly. The sensitivity for identifying squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was 88.5%. High-risk lesions including squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (SIN II, SIN III) and SCC were identified with a sensitivity of 86.4%, using a pap-analogous classification, which is considered to be carcinomatous, as well as moderate and severe dysplastic cells positive. Depending on the cytopathologic definition for malignancy and the tumour size, the test accuracy varied: Extending the cytopathologic criteria for malignancy by defining all dysplastic or malignant cytopathologic findings as positive, the sensitivity was increased to 95.2% at the expense of the specificity, which was reduced from 94.9% to 82.3%. Separately analysing SCCs of less than 20 mm, the sensitivity was reduced by 9.5% to 78%. Although small malignant lesions seem to be less reliable by the conventional oral brush biopsy, it is a useful screening instrument for early diagnosis of suspicious, epithelial lesions and could therefore contribute to improved cancer prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20593209     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0434-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  29 in total

Review 1.  Bethesda 2001.

Authors:  J H F Smith
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.073

2.  Psychosocial effects in long-term head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Richard L Holloway; James L Hellewell; Anne M Marbella; Peter M Layde; Katherine B Myers; Bruce H Campbell
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Potentially malignant epithelial oral lesions: discrepancies between clinical and histological diagnosis.

Authors:  M A Onofre; M R Sposto; C M Navarro; M E Motta; E Turatti; R T Almeida
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.511

4.  Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group.

Authors:  J J Sciubba
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 5.  Loss of heterozygosity: a potential tool in management of oral premalignant lesions?

Authors:  L Zhang; M P Rosin
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.253

Review 6.  Consensus report of the ESACP task force on standardization of diagnostic DNA image cytometry. European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

Authors:  A Böcking; F Giroud; A Reith
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.916

7.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Identification of progressive cervical epithelial cell abnormalities using DNA image cytometry.

Authors:  Hans Juergen Grote; Huy V Q Nguyen; Anand Gilbert Leick; Alfred Böcking
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-12-25       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Aspiration, weight loss, and quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Bruce H Campbell; Kristine Spinelli; Anne M Marbella; Katherine B Myers; Joan C Kuhn; Peter M Layde
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-09

10.  Low positive predictive value of the oral brush biopsy in detecting dysplastic oral lesions.

Authors:  Vinodh Bhoopathi; Sadru Kabani; Ana Karina Mascarenhas
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck in Fanconi anemia: risk, prevention, therapy, and the need for guidelines.

Authors:  K Scheckenbach; M Wagenmann; M Freund; J Schipper; H Hanenberg
Journal:  Klin Padiatr       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 1.349

2.  Use of endoscopy with narrow-band imaging system in detecting squamous cell carcinoma in oral chronic non-healing ulcers.

Authors:  Shih-Wei Yang; Yun-Shien Lee; Liang-Che Chang; Cheng-Cheng Hwang; Tai-An Chen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Evaluation of the Ki-67 and MCM3 Expression in Cytologic Smear of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Fahimeh Rezazadeh; Rahele Ebrahimi; Azadeh Andisheh-Tadbir; Mohammad Javad Ashraf; Bijan Khademi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2017-09

Review 4.  Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions.

Authors:  Richard Macey; Tanya Walsh; Paul Brocklehurst; Alexander R Kerr; Joseph L Y Liu; Mark W Lingen; Graham R Ogden; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Crispian Scully
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-29

Review 5.  A chemiluminescent light system in combination with toluidine blue to assess suspicious oral lesions-clinical evaluation and review of the literature.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; R K Rahimi-Nedjat; T Ziebart; A Bemsch; C Walter; B Al-Nawas; F P Koch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  The efficacy of oral brush biopsy with computer-assisted analysis in identifying precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Authors:  Ravi Mehrotra; Sanjay Mishra; Mamta Singh; Mangal Singh
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-08-24

Review 7.  Techniques for early diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review.

Authors:  Clàudia Carreras-Torras; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-05-01

Review 8.  Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems for treatment of oral cancer: a review.

Authors:  Giovana Calixto; Jéssica Bernegossi; Bruno Fonseca-Santos; Marlus Chorilli
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-08-08

9.  Mobile microscopy as a screening tool for oral cancer in India: A pilot study.

Authors:  Arunan Skandarajah; Sumsum P Sunny; Praveen Gurpur; Clay D Reber; Michael V D'Ambrosio; Nisheena Raghavan; Bonney Lee James; Ravindra D Ramanjinappa; Amritha Suresh; Uma Kandasarma; Praveen Birur; Vinay V Kumar; Honorius-Cezar Galmeanu; Alexandru Mihail Itu; Mihai Modiga-Arsu; Saskia Rausch; Maria Sramek; Manohar Kollegal; Gianluca Paladini; Moni Kuriakose; Lance Ladic; Felix Koch; Daniel Fletcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diagnostic tests for oral cancer and potentially malignant disorders in patients presenting with clinically evident lesions.

Authors:  Tanya Walsh; Richard Macey; Alexander R Kerr; Mark W Lingen; Graham R Ogden; Saman Warnakulasuriya
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.