Literature DB >> 17177045

[Oral cytology: historical development, current status, and perspectives].

M Hullmann1, T E Reichert, R Dahse, F von Eggeling, H Pistner, H Kosmehl, O Driemel.   

Abstract

Oral cytology has aroused new interest caused by introduction of the cytobrush as a sampling device and the use of additional analytical methods. By brushing it is possible to reach deeper layers of the oral mucosa where squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (SIN) begins. The biological potential of the oral epithelial cells obtained can be evaluated by the following additional methods: computer-assisted image analysis (OralCDx), DNA cytometry, immunohistochemistry, monolayer cytology, and molecular biological analysis. All of those methods can increase sensitivity (up to 100%) and specificity (up to 100%) of oral brush biopsy. Nevertheless, there are reports that oral epithelial carcinomas were not identified. No comparative study exists allowing conclusions to be drawn about the value of the single methods. Immunocytochemistry with commercial antibodies against laminin-5 is generally available and methodologically easy. Oral brush biopsy as a non invasive diagnostic method can be useful for the early detection of oral mucosal lesions. Positive findings or progression of the lesion despite negative findings are indications to refer the patient to a specialized clinic where a surgical biopsy should be performed, followed by histopathological analysis. Histopathology remains the gold standard for the definitive diagnosis of oral malignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17177045     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-006-0041-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  93 in total

1.  THE CYTOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF TUMORS OF THE ORAL CAVITY.

Authors:  H C SANDLER
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1964 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.319

2.  Effectiveness of acridine-binding method in screening for oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  D Roth; R L Hayes; N M Ross; L Gitman; B Kissin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Exfoliative cytologic changes in oral leukoplakia.

Authors:  J Bánóczy
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1969 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group.

Authors:  J J Sciubba
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Expression of p53 in oral squamous cell carcinoma is associated with the presence of IgG and IgA p53 autoantibodies in sera and saliva of the patients.

Authors:  S Warnakulasuriya; T Soussi; R Maher; N Johnson; M Tavassoli
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Computer-assisted analysis of oral brush biopsies at an oral cancer screening program.

Authors:  David C Christian
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.

Authors:  M E Boon; J J Alons-van Kordelaar; P E Rietveld-Scheffers
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.319

8.  The role of professional diagnostic delays in the prognosis of upper aerodigestive tract carcinoma.

Authors:  P Allison; E Franco; M Black; J Feine
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.337

9.  A minimally invasive immunocytochemical approach to early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma and dysplasia.

Authors:  I S Scott; E Odell; P Chatrath; L S Morris; R J Davies; S L Vowler; R A Laskey; N Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Diagnostic value of nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) in brush biopsies of suspicious lesions of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Torsten W Remmerbach; Horst Weidenbach; Conrad Müller; Alexander Hemprich; Natalja Pomjanski; Birgit Buckstegge; Alfred Böcking
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.916

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical and cytological study of the oral mucosa of smoking and non-smoking qat chewers in Yemen.

Authors:  M Hijazi; H Jentsch; J Al-Sanabani; M Tawfik; T W Remmerbach
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  [Identification of a recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma by brush cytology].

Authors:  Antonios Moralis; Martin Kunkel; Torsten Eugen Reichert; Hartwig Kosmehl; Oliver Driemel
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2007-12

3.  Bacterial colonization of microbial biofilms in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J Bolz; E Dosá; J Schubert; A W Eckert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  [Performance of conventional oral brush biopsies].

Authors:  O Driemel; M Kunkel; M Hullmann; N Kleinsasser; R Staudenmaier; U Müller-Richter; T E Reichert; H Kosmehl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Transepithelial Brush Biopsy - Oral CDx® - A Noninvasive Method for the Early Detection of Precancerous and Cancerous Lesions.

Authors:  Casparis S; Borm J M; Tomic M A; Burkhardt A; Locher M C
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  Techniques for precancerous lesion diagnosis.

Authors:  Sarah Freygang Mendes; Grasieli de Oliveira Ramos; Elena Riet Correa Rivero; Filipe Modolo; Liliane Janete Grando; Maria Inês Meurer
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Early detection in head and neck cancer - current state and future perspectives.

Authors:  Andreas O H Gerstner
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.