Literature DB >> 1740740

Trunk positioning accuracy in children 7-18 years old.

J A Ashton-Miller1, K M McGlashen, A B Schultz.   

Abstract

Trunk proprioception was measured in 253 healthy children 7-18 years of age using infrared markers placed on the back of the head and on the skin over the T1, T8, and S1 spinous processes. The children were tested for their accuracy in sensing return of the head and trunk to a centered, neutral position in the frontal plane. Whole-body sway was also quantified during 10 s of relaxed standing by measuring mean amplitudes of trunk marker and foot center of pressure (CP) movements. The results show that trunk positioning accuracy improved significantly with age (p = 0.000). Subjects could position their trunk in the frontal plane to within a mean (+/- SD) of 2.5 (+/- 1.1) and 0.9 (+/- 0.6) degrees of the neutral position at ages 7 and 18 years, respectively. No statistically significant gender differences were found. At every age trunk positioning accuracy was diminished in the presence of a continuous external trunk moment (equivalent to 0.01 x body weight x height), although not significantly so. Neither mean trunk sway nor CP amplitudes were significantly correlated with age or sex. The overall results suggest that spine decompensation is only abnormal when it exceeds 20 mm in healthy children and adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1740740     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100100209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  5 in total

1.  Reposition sense of lumbar curvature with flexed and asymmetric lifting postures.

Authors:  Sara E Wilson; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Cooling does not affect knee proprioception.

Authors:  J C Ozmun; H A Thieme; C D Ingersoll; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akel; Murat Pekmezci; Mutlu Hayran; Yasemin Genc; Ozgur Kocak; Orhan Derman; Ilkay Erdoğan; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Validation of spinal motion with the spine reposition sense device.

Authors:  Cheryl M Petersen; Peter J Rundquist
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  A new measurement method for spine reposition sense.

Authors:  Cheryl M Petersen; Chris L Zimmermann; Steven Cope; Mary Ellen Bulow; Erinn Ewers-Panveno
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.