Literature DB >> 25962815

Is neck tilt and shoulder imbalance the same phenomenon? A prospective analysis of 89 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (Lenke type 1 and 2).

Mun Keong Kwan1, Kai Ann Wong2, Chee Kean Lee3, Chris Yin Wei Chan4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To introduce a new clinical neck tilt grading and to investigate clinically and radiologically whether neck tilt and shoulder imbalance is the same phenomenon in AIS patients.
METHODS: 89 AIS Lenke 1 and 2 cases were assessed prospectively using the new clinical neck tilt grading. Shoulder imbalance and neck tilt were correlated with coracoid height difference (CHD), clavicle\rib intersection distance (CRID), clavicle angle (CA), radiographic shoulder height (RSH), T1 tilt and cervical axis.
RESULTS: Mean age was 17.2 ± 3.8 years old. 66.3 % were Lenke type 1 and 33.7 % were type 2 curves. Strong intraobserver (0.79) and interobserver (0.75) agreement of the clinical neck tilt grading was noted. No significant correlation was observed between clinical neck tilt and shoulder imbalance (0.936). 56.3 % of grade 3 neck tilt, 50.0 % grade 2 neck tilt patients had grade 0 shoulder imbalance. In patients with grade 2 shoulder imbalance, 42.9 % had grade 0, 35.7 % grade 1, 14.3 % grade 2 and only 7.1 % had grade 3 neck tilt. CHD, CRID, CA and RSH correlated with shoulder imbalance. T1 tilt and cervical axis measurements correlated with neck tilt.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, neck tilt is distinct from shoulder imbalance. Clinical neck tilt has poor correlation with clinical shoulder imbalance. Clinical neck tilt grading correlated with cervical axis and T1 tilt whereas clinical shoulder grading correlated with CHD, RSH CRID and CA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Lenke 1; Lenke 2; Neck tilt; Shoulder imbalance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25962815     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  32 in total

1.  Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  I V PONSETI; B FRIEDMAN
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1950-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Reliability analysis of shoulder balance measures: comparison of the 4 available methods.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Seung-Woo Suh; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Si-Young Park; Ji-Hoon Han
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  U R Liljenqvist; H F Halm; T M Link
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Spontaneous proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  T R Kuklo; L G Lenke; D S Won; E J Graham; F A Sweet; R R Betz; K H Bridwell; K M Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Se-Il Suk; Sang-Min Lee; Ewy-Ryong Chung; Jin-Hyok Kim; Sung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Panayiotis N Smyrnis; Nicholas Sekouris; George Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Recognition and treatment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; M F O'Brien; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: surgical strategy and management outcomes.

Authors:  Tarek Anwar Elfiky; Dino Samartzis; Wai-Yuen Cheung; Yat-Wa Wong; Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2011-12
View more
  9 in total

1.  Is there an optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle to prevent post-operative shoulder imbalance and neck tilt in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients?

Authors:  M K Kwan; C Y W Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Incidence and risk factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance in scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  ShengFei Zhang; Liang Zhang; XinMin Feng; HuiLin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Fulcrum flexibility of the main curve predicts postoperative shoulder imbalance in selective thoracic fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Soren Ohrt-Nissen; Vijay H D Kamath; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Cervicocephalic relocation test to evaluate cervical proprioception in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Marc-Alexandre Guyot; Olivier Agnani; Laurent Peyrodie; Demaille Samantha; Cécile Donze; Jean-Francois Catanzariti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Full fusion of proximal thoracic curve helps to prevent postoperative cervical tilt in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with right-elevated shoulder.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Bang-Ping Qian; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-Zhang Zhu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Cervical Supine Side-Bending versus Cervical Supine Traction Radiographs: Which Is Better in Predicting Proximal Thoracic Flexibility for Lenke 1 and 2 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Chee Kidd Chiu; Elrofai Suliman Bashir; Chris Yin Wei Chan; Mun Keong Kwan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-07-27

7.  Postoperative neck tilt in Lenke 1 and 2 AIS patients after correction surgery: a novel predictive index.

Authors:  Yilin Yang; Mingyuan Yang; Zongde Yang; Kai Chen; Jinyi Bai; Jian Zhao; Haijian Ni; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Evaluation of the Radiographic Risk Factors of Postoperative Shoulder Imbalance in Adult Scoliosis.

Authors:  Wencan Ke; Bingjin Wang; Wenbin Hua; Kun Wang; Shuai Li; Cao Yang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-09

9.  Predicting Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis among Chinese Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Bin Yan; Xinhai Lu; Qihua Qiu; Guohui Nie; Yeen Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.