Literature DB >> 18007243

Correlation between low triggered electromyographic thresholds and lumbar pedicle screw malposition: analysis of 4857 screws.

Barry L Raynor1, Lawrence G Lenke, Keith H Bridwell, Brett A Taylor, Anne M Padberg.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 1078 spinal surgical procedures with lumbar pedicle screw placement at a single institution.
OBJECTIVE: Based on previously established normative values, triggered electromyographic stimulation (TrgEMG) was re-examined to evaluate its efficacy in determining screw malposition. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Threshold values for confirmation of intraosseous placement of pedicle screws with EMG stimulation is controversial.
METHODS: TrgEMG threshold values for 4857 pedicle screws placed from L2 to S1 from 1996 to 2005 were analyzed. An ascending method of constant current stimulation was applied to each pedicle screw to obtain a compound muscle action potential (CMAP) from lower extremity myotomes. Previously determined threshold value normative data from a published clinical series of 233 screws were as follows: 0 to 4 mA, high likelihood of pedicle wall breach; 4 to 8 mA, possible pedicle wall breach; >8 mA, no pedicle wall defect.
RESULTS: A total of 7.74% (376 of 4857) of all screws tested had threshold values <8.0 mA. A total of 19.1% (72 of 376) of these were <4.0 mA: 54% (39 of 72) were repositioned (26) or removed (13) while the remaining 33 screws were left in place following repalpation. A total of 80.9% (304 of 376) had thresholds between 4 and 8 mA: 17.4% (53) were repositioned (38) or removed (15). Nine screws had thresholds of <or=2.8 mA and were either repositioned or removed following confirmation of a medial wall breach. A total of 74.5% (280 of 376) of all screws with thresholds <8.0 mA were verified as correctly placed by repalpation/radiography and therefore left in place.
CONCLUSION: The probability of a medial breach pedicle screw detected by triggered EMG stimulation increases with decreasing triggered EMG thresholds: 0.31% for >8.0 mA, 17.4% for 4.0 to 8.0 mA, 54.2% for <4.0 mA, and 100% for <2.8 mA. At 2.8 mA, triggered EMG has a specificity of 100%, with sensitivity of 8.4%; at 4.0 mA, specificity of 99% and sensitivity of 36%; and at 8.0 mA, 94% specificity and 86% sensitivity. TrgEMG is an adjunct technique and should always be used in conjunction with palpation and radiography to optimize safe pedicle screw placement.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18007243     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a524f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

1.  Triggered electromyography for placement of thoracic pedicle screws: is it reliable?

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; Mark Tantorski; Patrick J Cahill; Ashish Ranade; Stephen Koch; David H Clements; Randal R Betz; Jahangir Asghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

Authors:  Sebastian Siller; Constance Raith; Stefan Zausinger; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Andrea Szelenyi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Monitoring placement of high thoracic pedicle screws by triggered electromyography of the intercostal muscles.

Authors:  Jonathan A Norton; Douglas M Hedden
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Protection of the remaining spinal cord function with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during paraparetic scoliosis surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Zhengyong Chen; Joel Lerman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Lateral mass screw stimulation thresholds in posterior cervical instrumentation surgery: a predictor of medial deviation.

Authors:  Bayard Wilson; Erik Curtis; Brian Hirshman; Ahmet Oygar; Karen Chen; Brandon C Gabel; Florin Vaida; David W Allison; Joseph D Ciacci
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-12-09

Review 6.  [Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring with evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Nitzschke; N Hansen-Algenstaedt; J Regelsberger; A E Goetz; M S Goepfert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Less Invasive Pediatric Spinal Deformity Surgery: The Case for Robotic-Assisted Placement of Pedicle Screws.

Authors:  Kyle W Morse; Hila Otremski; Kira Page; Roger F Widmann
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-08

8.  The surgical learning curve and accuracy of minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement using CT based computer-assisted navigation plus continuous electromyography monitoring - a retrospective review of 627 screws in 150 patients.

Authors:  Martin James Wood; Jason McMillen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2014-12-01

9.  Utility of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Minimally Invasive Fusion of the Sacroiliac Joint.

Authors:  Michael Woods; Denise Birkholz; Regina MacBarb; Robyn Capobianco; Adam Woods
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  Solid and hollow pedicle screws affect the electrical resistance: A potential source of error with stimulus-evoked electromyography.

Authors:  Hongwei Wang; Xinhua Liao; Xianguang Ma; Changqing Li; Jianda Han; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.