Literature DB >> 18006068

Evaluation of a technique to measure latency jitter in event-related potentials.

A Roger D Thornton1.   

Abstract

Auditory selective attention results in larger event-related potentials (ERPs) than those recorded to unattended stimuli. Larger ERPs arise from either a greater number of neurons being stimulated or the same number of neurons with better synchrony. The synchrony aspect was studied in an attention experiment recording the N1 response and showed that the latency jitter was significantly less (p=0.002) for the responses to attended stimuli compared with those to unattended stimuli. Here the improved technique to measure latency jitter is the focus of study. Simulated responses were used to evaluate the technique's performance at different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and compare it to the standard technique. Checks that the technique had performed satisfactorily in each case were achieved and a measure of reliability for each result was developed. The parameters defining the technique were varied and the optimum values chosen. This new technique opens the way for researchers to investigate the latency properties of lower SNR ERPs and gives a new insight into auditory selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006068     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  11 in total

1.  Role of latency jittering correction in motion-onset VEP amplitude decay during prolonged visual stimulation.

Authors:  J Kremláček; M Hulan; M Kuba; Z Kubová; J Langrová; F Vít; J Szanyi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Waveform variance and latency jitter of the visual evoked potential in childhood.

Authors:  John P Kelly; Felix Darvas; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter.

Authors:  John P Kelly; James O Phillips; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Development of a method to compensate for signal quality variations in repeated auditory event-related potential recordings.

Authors:  Antti K O Paukkunen; Miika M Leminen; Raimo Sepponen
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2010-03-16

5.  A spatiotemporal framework for MEG/EEG evoked response amplitude and latency variability estimation.

Authors:  Tulaya Limpiti; Barry D Van Veen; Ronald T Wakai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Effect of biological factors on latency of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials associated with cathode ray tubes and liquid crystal display monitors in normal young subjects.

Authors:  Midori Ura; Mutsuki Matsuo; Haruna Yamazaki; Hiroshi Morita
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Audio-visual speech perception: a developmental ERP investigation.

Authors:  Victoria C P Knowland; Evelyne Mercure; Annette Karmiloff-Smith; Fred Dick; Michael S C Thomas
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-10-31

8.  Mind the Noise When Identifying Computational Models of Cognition from Brain Activity.

Authors:  Antonio Kolossa; Bruno Kopp
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Single-Trial Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Averaged P300 ERP Amplitude and Latency in Military Service Members After Combat Deployment.

Authors:  Amy Trongnetrpunya; Paul Rapp; Chao Wang; David Darmon; Michelle E Costanzo; Dominic E Nathan; Michael J Roy; Christopher J Cellucci; David Keyser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Where do the eyes really go in the hollow-face illusion?

Authors:  Marc Grosjean; Gerhard Rinkenauer; Stephanie Jainta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.