Literature DB >> 24146335

Waveform variance and latency jitter of the visual evoked potential in childhood.

John P Kelly1, Felix Darvas, Avery H Weiss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recording the visual evoked potential (VEP) in young children is challenging due to movement artifacts with variable fixation or attention. This study examined the effects of latency jitter, noise, and waveform consistency on the averaging of the VEP across childhood age.
METHODS: Stimuli were contrast-reversing (1.4 Hz) checkerboards of 163 arc minutes and pattern-onset-offset of 0.5 cycle/degree horizontal sine-wave gratings. Subjects were 79 normal children (0.3-16 years age; mean 6.9). Results were compared to recordings of EEG noise only (noise controls). Epochs underwent four averaging methods: (1) latency jitter correction using cross-correlation, (2) correction of phase shifts across a limited bandwidth in the Fourier domain, (3) selection of epochs based on consistency in the time domain, and (4) selection of epochs based on phase consistency in the Fourier domain. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were estimated in both the time and Fourier domains.
RESULTS: Compared to standard averaging, all methods improved the amplitude of the primary peak (P100) while generating mild changes in latency. All methods also increased amplitudes of residual peaks in noise controls. In VEPs with an adequate SNR, selective averaging in the Fourier domain provided the greatest improvement in amplitude (61 % increase; p < 0.0001) without prolongation in latency. Correction of latency jitter did not consistently improve amplitude but caused latency prolongation in 24 % of subjects. There was no age-related effect of any averaging method for either stimulus.
CONCLUSIONS: Since latency jitter correction does not improve VEP amplitude more than selective averaging, recording artifacts in children are dominated by random phase components rather than inducing latency jitter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24146335     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-013-9415-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  22 in total

1.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria.

Authors:  T W Picton; S Bentin; P Berg; E Donchin; S A Hillyard; R Johnson; G A Miller; W Ritter; D S Ruchkin; M D Rugg; M J Taylor
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Role of latency jittering correction in motion-onset VEP amplitude decay during prolonged visual stimulation.

Authors:  J Kremláček; M Hulan; M Kuba; Z Kubová; J Langrová; F Vít; J Szanyi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Yonatan Bahir; Rina Leibu; Ido Perlman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Motion-onset VEPs: characteristics, methods, and diagnostic use.

Authors:  M Kuba; Z Kubová; J Kremlácek; J Langrová
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Trial-to-trial variability of single potentials: methodological concepts and results.

Authors:  J Möcks; T Gasser; D T Pham; W Köhler
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.292

6.  Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  C W Tyler; P Apkarian; D M Levi; K Nakayama
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Signal to noise ratio and response variability measurements in single trial evoked potentials.

Authors:  R Coppola; R Tabor; M S Buchsbaum
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-02

8.  An electrophysiological technique for assessment of the development of spatial vision.

Authors:  V Zemon; E E Hartmann; J Gordon; A Prünte-Glowazki
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  ERGs, cone-isolating VEPs and analytical techniques in children with cone dysfunction syndromes.

Authors:  John P Kelly; Michael A Crognale; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  4 in total

1.  VEP analysis methods in children with optic nerve hypoplasia: relationship to visual acuity and optic disc diameter.

Authors:  John P Kelly; James O Phillips; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The relationship of nystagmus waveform on the VEP response in infantile nystagmus syndrome: a small case series.

Authors:  John P Kelly; James O Phillips; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual Evoked Potentials as a Readout of Cortical Function in Infants With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.

Authors:  Kandice J Varcin; Charles A Nelson; Jordan Ko; Mustafa Sahin; Joyce Y Wu; Shafali Spurling Jeste
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Cerebral Visual Impairment Characterized by Abnormal Visual Orienting Behavior With Preserved Visual Cortical Activation.

Authors:  John P Kelly; James O Phillips; Russell P Saneto; Hedieh Khalatbari; Andrew Poliakov; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Avery H Weiss
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.