Midori Ura1,2, Mutsuki Matsuo3,4, Haruna Yamazaki5, Hiroshi Morita6. 1. Department of Medical Laboratory Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Junshin Gakuen University, 1-1-1, Chikushigaoka, Fukuoka, 815-8510, Japan. ura.m@junshin-u.ac.jp. 2. Department of Laboratory Science, Shinshu University Hospital, Nagano, Japan. ura.m@junshin-u.ac.jp. 3. School of Health Sciences, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan. 4. Clinical Laboratory, International University of Health Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan. 5. Department of Laboratory Science, Shinshu University Hospital, Nagano, Japan. 6. Center for Health Safety and Environmental Management, Shinshu University, Nagano, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Owing to several factors, peak latencies of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (p-VEP) are delayed when viewing liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors compared to those evoked when viewing cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors. However, few studies have examined whether biological factors affect latency in LCD. This study aimed to investigate whether biological factors caused latency changes in LCD among young subjects. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects (56 eyes) aged 21-29 years (mean ± SD, 22.7 ± 1.7) participated in this study. We recorded output from each eye twice for both CRT and LCD monitors under the same conditions for monocular p-VEP. The peak latencies of three components (N75, P100, and N145) were compared between these two monitors. RESULTS: All peak latencies recorded with LCD were delayed compared to those recorded with CRT: N75, 9.7 ± 2.5 ms; P100, 10.1 ± 3.0 ms; and N145, 8.4 ± 6.2 ms (all p < 0.001). The degree of latency delay varied depending on the components. Moreover, all peak latencies of CRT appeared earlier than standard values of N75, P100, and N145. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the following aspects should be considered when assessing biological factors that may affect latency: components might influence latency changes; a young age could be related to an early appearance of peak latencies; inter-individual differences might cause latency change. These biological factors should be considered as possible causes for the varying latencies in an LCD monitor. Further studies should include healthy adults with a wider age range to assess the effects of age on latency.
PURPOSE: Owing to several factors, peak latencies of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (p-VEP) are delayed when viewing liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors compared to those evoked when viewing cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors. However, few studies have examined whether biological factors affect latency in LCD. This study aimed to investigate whether biological factors caused latency changes in LCD among young subjects. METHODS: Twenty-eight subjects (56 eyes) aged 21-29 years (mean ± SD, 22.7 ± 1.7) participated in this study. We recorded output from each eye twice for both CRT and LCD monitors under the same conditions for monocular p-VEP. The peak latencies of three components (N75, P100, and N145) were compared between these two monitors. RESULTS: All peak latencies recorded with LCD were delayed compared to those recorded with CRT: N75, 9.7 ± 2.5 ms; P100, 10.1 ± 3.0 ms; and N145, 8.4 ± 6.2 ms (all p < 0.001). The degree of latency delay varied depending on the components. Moreover, all peak latencies of CRT appeared earlier than standard values of N75, P100, and N145. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the following aspects should be considered when assessing biological factors that may affect latency: components might influence latency changes; a young age could be related to an early appearance of peak latencies; inter-individual differences might cause latency change. These biological factors should be considered as possible causes for the varying latencies in an LCD monitor. Further studies should include healthy adults with a wider age range to assess the effects of age on latency.