Literature DB >> 20211120

Investigating speechreading and deafness.

Edward T Auer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The visual speech signal can provide sufficient information to support successful communication. However, individual differences in the ability to appreciate that information are large, and relatively little is known about their sources.
PURPOSE: Here a body of research is reviewed regarding the development of a theoretical framework in which to study speechreading and individual differences in that ability. Based on the hypothesis that visual speech is processed via the same perceptual-cognitive machinery as auditory speech, a theoretical framework was developed by adapting a theoretical framework originally developed for auditory spoken word recognition.
CONCLUSION: The evidence to date is consistent with the conclusion that visual spoken word recognition is achieved via a process similar to auditory word recognition provided differences in perceptual similarity are taken into account. Words perceptually similar to many other words and that occur infrequently in the input stream are at a distinct disadvantage within this process. The results to date are also consistent with the conclusion that deaf individuals, regardless of speechreading ability, recognize spoken words via a process similar to individuals with hearing. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20211120      PMCID: PMC3715375          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.3.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  27 in total

1.  Speech perception without hearing.

Authors:  L E Bernstein; M E Demorest; P E Tucker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

2.  Enhanced speechreading in deaf adults: can short-term training/practice close the gap for hearing adults?

Authors:  L E Bernstein; E T Auer; P E Tucker
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Visual speech perception without primary auditory cortex activation.

Authors:  Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer; Jean K Moore; Curtis W Ponton; Manual Don; Manbir Singh
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Stimulus-based lexical distinctiveness as a general word-recognition mechanism.

Authors:  Sven L Mattys; Lynne E Bernstein; Edward T Auer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-05

5.  Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words.

Authors:  M Gareth Gaskell; William D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

7.  Locus of segmental cues for word juncture.

Authors:  L H Nakatani; K D Dukes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Confusions among visually perceived consonants.

Authors:  C G Fisher
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1968-12

9.  Physical characteristics of the lips underlying vowel lipreading performance.

Authors:  A A Montgomery; P L Jackson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spoken word recognition by eye.

Authors:  Edward T Auer
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of linguistic properties and hearing impairment on visual speech perception skills in the German language.

Authors:  Nina Suess; Anne Hauswald; Verena Zehentner; Jessica Depireux; Gudrun Herzog; Sebastian Rösch; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.