Literature DB >> 17980984

A perceptual architecture for sound lateralization in man.

Dennis P Phillips1.   

Abstract

There are two general neurophysiological models of sound lateralization mechanisms which may be active in man. Both of the models are derived from studies in animals (one in barn owls, and one in mammals), and both have displayed some weakness in generalizability. One model advocates a population of neurons narrowly tuned to different interaural disparity values across the behaviorally relevant range, so that the cue value, and therefore the source azimuth, is represented by which neurons of the array are activated by the stimulus. The second model posits the existence of only two neural channels, each broadly tuned to interaural cue values favoring one acoustic hemifield, so that, especially for sources near the midline, cue value and therefore source azimuth is encoded by the relative activation of the two neural populations. The present article reviews three recent psychophysical studies, each using selective adaptation paradigms to probe sound lateralization mechanisms based on interaural disparities in normal human listeners. These experiments provided evidence on the frequency-specificity of interaural disparity coding and revealed its sensitivity to recent stimulus history. The data from those studies, however, also help distinguish the two lateralization models, and favor a perceptual architecture for sound lateralization in man based on the activity of two, hemifield-tuned azimuthal channels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980984     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  16 in total

1.  Systematic representation of sound locations in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Specialization for sound localization in fields A1, DZ, and PAF of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Chen-Chung Lee; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-21

3.  Stream segregation with high spatial acuity.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks; Zekiye A Onsan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Where did that noise come from? Memory for sound locations is exceedingly eccentric both in front and in rear space.

Authors:  Franco Delogu; Phillip McMurray
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-06-13

5.  Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  David A Magezi; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Rat primary auditory cortex is tuned exclusively to the contralateral hemifield.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Peter Bremen; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.

Authors:  Kiki van der Heijden; Josef P Rauschecker; Beatrice de Gelder; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Resolution of lateral acoustic space assessed by electroencephalography and psychoacoustics.

Authors:  Jan Bennemann; Claudia Freigang; Erich Schröger; Rudolf Rübsamen; Nicole Richter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.