Literature DB >> 17980500

On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Z Jay Chen1, Jun Deng, Kenneth Roberts, Ravinder Nath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Surgical trauma-induced edema and its protracted resolution can lead to significant dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy. The purpose of this work was to examine whether these dose reductions should be actively compensated for and to estimate the magnitude of the additional irradiation needed for dose compensation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The quantitative edema resolution characteristics observed by Waterman et al. were used to examine the physical and radiobiologic effects of prostate edema in preplanned (131)Cs implants. The need for dose compensation was assessed using the dose responses observed in (125)I and (103)Pd prostate implants. The biologically effective dose, calculated with full consideration of edema evolution, was used to estimate the additional irradiation needed for dose compensation.
RESULTS: We found that the edema-induced dose reduction in preplanned (131)Cs implants could easily exceed 10% of the prescription dose for implants with moderate or large edema. These dose reductions could lead to a >10% reduction in the biochemical recurrence-free survival for individual patients if the effect of edema was ignored. For a prescribed dose of 120 Gy, the number of 2-Gy external beam fractions needed to compensate for a 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25% edema-induced dose reduction would be one, four, six, seven, and nine, respectively, for prostate cancer with a median potential doubling time of 42 days. The required additional irradiation increased for fast-growing tumors and/or those less efficient in sublethal damage repair.
CONCLUSION: Compensation of edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy should be actively considered for those implants with moderate or large edema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980500      PMCID: PMC2289996          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  42 in total

1.  On the determination of an effective planning volume for permanent prostate implants.

Authors:  E K Lee; M Zaider
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Dosimetric comparison of pre-planned and or-planned prostate seed brachytherapy.

Authors:  D A Wilkinson; E J Lee; J P Ciezki; D S Mohan; C Zippe; K Angermeier; J Ulchaker; E A Klein; D Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Intraoperative preplanning for transperineal ultrasound-guided permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  R M Gewanter; C Wuu; J L Laguna; A E Katz; R D Ennis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Prostatic edema in 125I permanent prostate implants: dynamical dosimetry taking volume changes into account.

Authors:  Ghyslain Leclerc; Marie-Claude Lavallée; René Roy; Eric Vigneault; Luc Beaulieu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Impact of differences in ultrasound and computed tomography volumes on treatment planning of permanent prostate implants.

Authors:  V Narayana; P L Roberson; A T Pu; H Sandler; R H Winfield; P W McLaughlin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  A theoretical investigation into the role of tumour radiosensitivity, clonogen repopulation, tumour shrinkage and radionuclide RBE in permanent brachytherapy implants of 125I and 103Pd.

Authors:  V Antipas; R G Dale; I P Coles
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.

Authors:  N Yue; Z Chen; R Peschel; A P Dicker; F M Waterman; R Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  L Potters; Y Cao; E Calugaru; T Torre; P Fearn; X H Wang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Is alpha/beta for prostate tumors really low?

Authors:  J Fowler; R Chappell; M Ritter
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Dosimetric effects of edema in permanent prostate seed implants: a rigorous solution.

Authors:  Z Chen; N Yue; X Wang; K B Roberts; R Peschel; R Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  2 in total

1.  Intraoperative Registered Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (iRUF) for dose calculation during prostate brachytherapy: Improved accuracy compared to standard ultrasound-based dosimetry.

Authors:  Junghoon Lee; Omar Y Mian; Yi Le; Hee Joon Bae; E Clif Burdette; Theodore L DeWeese; Jerry L Prince; Daniel Y Song
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Edema-induced changes in tumor cell surviving fraction and tumor control probability in 131Cs permanent prostate brachytherapy implant patients.

Authors:  Than S Kehwar; Heather A Jones; M Saiful Huq; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.