Literature DB >> 16878561

Prostatic edema in 125I permanent prostate implants: dynamical dosimetry taking volume changes into account.

Ghyslain Leclerc1, Marie-Claude Lavallée, René Roy, Eric Vigneault, Luc Beaulieu.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of edema on the dose delivered to the target volume. An evaluation of the edema characteristics was first made, and then a dynamical dosimetry algorithm was developed and used to compare its results to a standard clinical (static) dosimetry. Source positions and prostate contours extracted from 66 clinical cases on images taken at different points in time (planning, implant day, post-implant evaluation) were used, via the mean interseed distance, to characterize edema [initial increase (deltar0), half-life (tau)]. An algorithm was developed to take into account the edema by summing a time series of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) with a weight based on the fraction of the dose delivered during the time interval considered. The algorithm was then used to evaluate the impact of edema on the dosimetry of permanent implants by comparing its results to those of a standard clinical dosimetry. The volumetric study yielded results as follows: the initial prostate volume increase was found to be 1.58 (ranging from 1.15 to 2.48) and the edema half-life, approximately 30 days (range: 3 to 170 days). The dosimetric differences in D90 observed between the dynamic dosimetry and the clinical one for a single case were up to 15 Gy and depended on the edema half-life and the initial volume increase. The average edema half-life, 30 days, is about 3 times longer than the previously reported 9 days. Dosimetric differences up to 10% of the prescription dose are observed, which can lead to differences in the quality assertion of an implant. The study of individual patient edema resorption with time might be necessary to extract meaningful clinical correlation or biological parameters in permanent implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16878561     DOI: 10.1118/1.2168066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  The impact of prostate edema on cell survival and tumor control after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancers.

Authors:  Zhe Jay Chen; Kenneth Roberts; Roy Decker; Pradip Pathare; Sara Rockwell; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Intraoperative Registered Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (iRUF) for dose calculation during prostate brachytherapy: Improved accuracy compared to standard ultrasound-based dosimetry.

Authors:  Junghoon Lee; Omar Y Mian; Yi Le; Hee Joon Bae; E Clif Burdette; Theodore L DeWeese; Jerry L Prince; Daniel Y Song
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants.

Authors:  Ron S Sloboda; N Usmani; T T Monajemi; D M-C Liu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

5.  Case series analysis of post-brachytherapy prostate edema and its relevance to post-implant dosimetry. Post-implant prostate edema and dosimetry.

Authors:  Ajay Tejwani; Eva Bieniek; Lindsay Puckett; Amir Lavaf; Adel Guirguis; Aaron Bennish; Hani Ashamalla
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-06-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.