Literature DB >> 10889396

Dosimetric effects of edema in permanent prostate seed implants: a rigorous solution.

Z Chen1, N Yue, X Wang, K B Roberts, R Peschel, R Nath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To derive a rigorous analytic solution to the dosimetric effects of prostate edema so that its impact on the conventional pre-implant and post-implant dosimetry can be studied for any given radioactive isotope and edema characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The edema characteristics observed by Waterman et al (Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys, 41:1069-1077; 1998) was used to model the time evolution of the prostate and the seed locations. The total dose to any part of prostate tissue from a seed implant was calculated analytically by parameterizing the dose fall-off from a radioactive seed as a single inverse power function of distance, with proper account of the edema-induced time evolution. The dosimetric impact of prostate edema was determined by comparing the dose calculated with full consideration of prostate edema to that calculated with the conventional dosimetry approach where the seed locations and the target volume are assumed to be stationary.
RESULTS: A rigorous analytic solution on the relative dosimetric effects of prostate edema was obtained. This solution proved explicitly that the relative dosimetric effects of edema, as found in the previous numerical studies by Yue et. al. (Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 43, 447-454, 1999), are independent of the size and the shape of the implant target volume and are independent of the number and the locations of the seeds implanted. It also showed that the magnitude of relative dosimetric effects is independent of the location of dose evaluation point within the edematous target volume. It implies that the relative dosimetric effects of prostate edema are universal with respect to a given isotope and edema characteristic. A set of master tables for the relative dosimetric effects of edema were obtained for a wide range of edema characteristics for both (125)I and (103)Pd prostate seed implants.
CONCLUSIONS: A rigorous analytic solution of the relative dosimetric effects of prostate edema has been derived for a class of edema characterized by Waterman et al. The solution proved that the dosimetric effects caused by the edema are universal functions of edema characteristics for a given isotope. It provides an efficient tool to examine the relative dosimetric effects of edema for any given edema characteristics and for any isotopes that may be considered for prostate implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10889396     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00549-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

1.  AAPM recommendations on dose prescription and reporting methods for permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: report of Task Group 137.

Authors:  Ravinder Nath; William S Bice; Wayne M Butler; Zhe Chen; Ali S Meigooni; Vrinda Narayana; Mark J Rivard; Yan Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Intraoperative 3D reconstruction of prostate brachytherapy implants with automatic pose correction.

Authors:  Junghoon Lee; Nathanael Kuo; Anton Deguet; Ehsan Dehghan; Danny Y Song; Everette C Burdette; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Intraoperative Registered Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy (iRUF) for dose calculation during prostate brachytherapy: Improved accuracy compared to standard ultrasound-based dosimetry.

Authors:  Junghoon Lee; Omar Y Mian; Yi Le; Hee Joon Bae; E Clif Burdette; Theodore L DeWeese; Jerry L Prince; Daniel Y Song
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Impact of edema and seed movement on the dosimetry of prostate seed implants.

Authors:  Ron S Sloboda; N Usmani; T T Monajemi; D M-C Liu
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-04

6.  The biological effect of 125I seed continuous low dose rate irradiation in CL187 cells.

Authors:  Hong-Qing Zhuang; Jun-Jie Wang; An-Yan Liao; Ji-Dong Wang; Yong Zhao
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-29

7.  Automated estimation of number of implanted iodine-125 seeds for prostate brachytherapy based on two-view analysis of pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  Hidemichi Kawata; Hidetaka Arimura; Hiroaki Suefuji; Sunao Ohkura; Yoshifumi Saida; Kazutaka Nashiki; Kazuya Hayashida; Tomomi Kawahara; Ayumu Ohishi; Naofumi Hayabuchi
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Comparison of two treatment approaches for prostate cancer: intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with 125I seed-implant brachytherapy or 125I seed-implant brachytherapy alone.

Authors:  Yulin Song; Maria F Chan; Chandra Burman; Donald Cann
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.