Literature DB >> 11395226

A comprehensive review of CT-based dosimetry parameters and biochemical control in patients treated with permanent prostate brachytherapy.

L Potters1, Y Cao, E Calugaru, T Torre, P Fearn, X H Wang.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The American Brachytherapy Society recommends that postprostate implant dosimetry be performed on all patients undergoing transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy (TIPPB) utilizing CT scan clinical target volume reconstructions. This study was undertaken to assess the recommended dosimetry parameters from a large cohort of patients undergoing TIPPB that would predict for PSA relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seven hundred nineteen consecutive patients with clinical stage T1/T2 adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent TIPPB using either I-125 or Pd-103. Postimplant dosimetry was performed at 2 to 3 weeks with CT scan 3-dimensional reconstructions obtained on all patients. The D90 and D100 doses (defined as the minimum dose covering 90% and 100% of the prostate volume, respectively) and the V100 (defined as the percent of the prostate receiving 100% of the prescribed dose) were obtained for each patient. Regression analysis was performed on the D90 dose, D100 dose, and V100 to test for cutoff points that would predict for PSA-RFS, defined by a modification of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus panel statement. A cutoff value was found and was subjected to subset analysis to assess for its robustness. Treatment-related factors were tested for their ability to achieve dosimetry at or above the cutoff dose.
RESULTS: The median follow-up from this cohort is 30 months (7-71 months) with a 48-month PSA-RFS of 89.5%. A D90 dose-response cutoff value > or =90% of the prescribed dose was identified. Prostate implants with a D90 dose <90% of the prescribed dose had an 80.4% 4-year PSA-RFS, while those with a D90 dose > or =90% of the prescribed dose had a 92.4% 4-year PSA-RFS (p = 0.001). No cutoff value was found for the V100 and D100 dose that predicted for PSA-RFS. Using the cutoff value, the D90 dose at 90% of the prescribed dose, a difference in 4-year PSA-RFS survival was identified for patients treated with I-125 (p = 0.04), Pd-103 (p = 0.01), TIPPB as monotherapy (p = 0.001), the addition of hormone therapy (p = 0.005), and TIPPB without hormone therapy (p = 0.001). The D90 dose was not significant for the group of patients treated with external beam radiotherapy and TIPPB (p = 0.15). The only significant finding from Cox regression analysis to predict for a poor D90 dose (<90% of the prescribed dose) was a CT/TRUS volume ratio >1.5 (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The American Brachytherapy Society recommends that postimplant CT-based dosimetry be performed for all patients treated with TIPPB. This prospective study identified that the D90 dose > or =90% of the prescribed dose can be used as a factor for predicting PSA-RFS in patients treated with brachytherapy. A dose-response using the D90 dose was observed for several typical clinical treatment variations used in the practice of TIPPB. Using the D90 dose appears to be a satisfactory parameter for predicting outcome in patients treated with TIPPB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11395226     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01473-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  27 in total

1.  Preliminary study of correction of original metal artifacts due to 1-125 seeds in postimplant dosimetry for prostate permanent implant brachytherapy.

Authors:  Yutaka Takahashi; Shinichiro Mori; Takuyo Kozuka; Kotaro Gomi; Takayuki Nose; Takatoshi Tahara; Masahiko Oguchi; Takashi Yamashita
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-02

2.  CT-based postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy: comparison of 1-mm and 5-mm section CT.

Authors:  Osamu Tanaka; Shinya Hayashi; Masayuki Kanematsu; Masayuki Matsuo; Masahiro Nakano; Sunaho Maeda; Takashi Deguchi; Hiroaki Hoshi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

3.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy: the significance of postimplant dosimetry.

Authors:  W Robert Lee
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

4.  A systematic evaluation of the dose-rate constant determined by photon spectrometry for 21 different models of low-energy photon-emitting brachytherapy sources.

Authors:  Zhe Jay Chen; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Preimplant factors affecting postimplant CT-determined prostate volume and the CT/TRUS volume ratio after transperineal interstitial prostate brachytherapy with 125I free seeds.

Authors:  Akitomo Sugawara; Jun Nakashima; Etsuo Kunieda; Hirohiko Nagata; Hirotaka Asakura; Mototsugu Oya; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Results from the Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO) survey: Evaluation of dosimetric outcomes for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Gil'ad N Cohen; Walter R Bosch; Lisa Morikawa; Najma Khalid; Cheryl L Crozier; W Robert Lee; Anthony Zietman; Jean Owen; J Frank Wilson; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Real-time intraoperative computed tomography assessment of quality of permanent interstitial seed implantation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Mick Worman; Gilad N Cohen; Xin Pei; Marisa Kollmeier; Josh Yamada; Brett Cox; Zhigang Zhang; Eva Bieniek; Lawrence Dauer; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Comparison of flat cleaved and cylindrical diffusing fibers as treatment sources for interstitial photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Timothy M Baran; Thomas H Foster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 10.  [Curative radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Treatment methods and results].

Authors:  R Schwarz
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.