Literature DB >> 17974534

Removal torque of osseointegrated mini-implants: an in vivo evaluation.

Luca Giuseppe Favero1, Andrea Pisoni, Corrado Paganelli.   

Abstract

The possibility of using osseointegrated implants for orthodontic anchorage is well known. When absolute orthodontic anchorage is needed, mini-implants can be inserted in the non-alveolar bone area (e.g. palatal process or retromolar areas of the mandible). However, what happens to these implants at the end of treatment can be a problem as neither trephine explantation nor simply leaving the subgingival part of the implant in the bone permanently are acceptable solutions. In this investigation, 16 Exacta small screw titanium implants (Exacta MS series conical profile, with a diameter of 3.3 mm and a length of 7.0 mm) were used as indirect orthodontic anchorage in 16 adult patients. The site of implant placement was established based on radiological investigations. There were eight palatal and eight retromolar implants inserted in seven males and nine females (mean age 30.3 years). On completion of treatment, the implants were unscrewed to the maximum limits of their removal torque values (RTVs) and the obtained data were analysed using a t-test. An in vitro study before the clinical trial was also undertaken to determine the maximum mechanical resistance of the unscrewing system. The clinical procedure and average RTV (67.91 +/- 12.47 N/cm) were considered compatible with safe, non-invasive removal of the implant followed by rapid anatomical reconstruction of the area involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17974534     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of torque-limiting devices for mini-implant removal: an in vitro study.

Authors:  A Pauls; M Nienkemper; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Experimental investigation of the fracture torque of orthodontic anchorage screws.

Authors:  Susanne Reimann; Mustafa Ayubi; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison between microporous and nanoporous orthodontic miniscrews : An experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Yueh-Tse Lee; Eric Jein-Wein Liou; Sinn-Wen Chen
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Stability of smooth and rough mini-implants: clinical and biomechanical evaluation - an in vivostudy.

Authors:  Giselle Naback Lemes Vilani; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas; Carlos Nelson Elias; Cláudia Trindade Mattos
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015-10

5.  Mechanical properties of self-drilling orthodontic micro-implants with different diameters.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Hee Moon Kyung; Limin Gao; Won-Jae Yu; Eun-Ju Bae; Sang-Min Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 6.  Photobiomodulation and implants: implications for dentistry.

Authors:  Elieza Tang; Praveen Arany
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Selectable Implant Removal Methods due to Mechanical and Biological Failures.

Authors:  Jong-Bin Lee
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2017-07-05

8.  Factors influencing the removal torque of palatal implant used for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Marc Andreas Schätzle; Monika Hersberger-Zurfluh; Raphael Patcas
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.750

9.  Degradation and Biocompatibility of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Implants In Vitro and In Vivo: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study in Rats.

Authors:  Naohiko Kawamura; Yuya Nakao; Rina Ishikawa; Dai Tsuchida; Masahiro Iijima
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.