Literature DB >> 17971325

Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved.

Andreas Wagner1.   

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between robustness and evolvability is key to understand how living things can withstand mutations, while producing ample variation that leads to evolutionary innovations. Mutational robustness and evolvability, a system's ability to produce heritable variation, harbour a paradoxical tension. On one hand, high robustness implies low production of heritable phenotypic variation. On the other hand, both experimental and computational analyses of neutral networks indicate that robustness enhances evolvability. I here resolve this tension using RNA genotypes and their secondary structure phenotypes as a study system. To resolve the tension, one must distinguish between robustness of a genotype and a phenotype. I confirm that genotype (sequence) robustness and evolvability share an antagonistic relationship. In stark contrast, phenotype (structure) robustness promotes structure evolvability. A consequence is that finite populations of sequences with a robust phenotype can access large amounts of phenotypic variation while spreading through a neutral network. Population-level processes and phenotypes rather than individual sequences are key to understand the relationship between robustness and evolvability. My observations may apply to other genetic systems where many connected genotypes produce the same phenotypes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17971325      PMCID: PMC2562401          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA.

Authors:  L W Ancel; W Fontana
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2000-10-15

2.  Cooperation and conflict in the evolution of individuality. IV. Conflict mediation and evolvability in Volvox carteri.

Authors:  Richard E Michod; Aurora M Nedelcu; Denis Roze
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability.

Authors:  Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Evolution of evolvability via adaptation of mutation rates.

Authors:  Mark A Bedau; Norman H Packard
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  A mechanistic study of evolvability using the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade.

Authors:  H F Nijhout; A M Berg; W T Gibson
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 6.  Modelling 'evo-devo' with RNA.

Authors:  Walter Fontana
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Evolvability is a selectable trait.

Authors:  David J Earl; Michael W Deem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Extensive sequence-specific information throughout the CAR/RRE, the target sequence of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev protein.

Authors:  E T Dayton; D A Konings; D M Powell; B A Shapiro; L Butini; J V Maizel; A I Dayton
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  The evolution of the evolvability properties of the yeast prion [PSI+].

Authors:  Joanna Masel; Aviv Bergman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation.

Authors:  Christine Queitsch; Todd A Sangster; Susan Lindquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  194 in total

Review 1.  The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Epistasis can lead to fragmented neutral spaces and contingency in evolution.

Authors:  Steffen Schaper; Iain G Johnston; Ard A Louis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A comparison of genotype-phenotype maps for RNA and proteins.

Authors:  Evandro Ferrada; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Mutational fitness effects in RNA and single-stranded DNA viruses: common patterns revealed by site-directed mutagenesis studies.

Authors:  Rafael Sanjuán
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The evolvability of programmable hardware.

Authors:  Karthik Raman; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Robustness versus evolvability: a paradigm revisited.

Authors:  Erich Bornberg-Bauer; Linus Kramer
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2010-05-07

7.  Mutational robustness and resilience of a replicative cis-element of RNA virus: Promiscuity, limitations, relevance.

Authors:  Maria A Prostova; Anatoly P Gmyl; Denis V Bakhmutov; Anna A Shishova; Elena V Khitrina; Marina S Kolesnikova; Marina V Serebryakova; Olga V Isaeva; Vadim I Agol
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Limits of neutral drift: lessons from the in vitro evolution of two ribozymes.

Authors:  Katherine L Petrie; Gerald F Joyce
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  Decanalizing thinking on genetic canalization.

Authors:  Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Federica M O Sartori; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 10.  Engineering reduced evolutionary potential for synthetic biology.

Authors:  Brian A Renda; Michael J Hammerling; Jeffrey E Barrick
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2014-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.