Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Literature DB >> 15322740

Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Abstract

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current "gold standard" for diagnosing osteoporosis and for monitoring patients. Errors in demographic information, improper patient positioning, incorrect scan analysis, and mistakes in interpretation can all lead to a wrong clinical decision or action. This paper reviews the fundamentals of positioning, scan analysis, and interpretation for central DXA and highlights some of the common pitfalls that may lead to erroneous results.

Entities: Disease Species

Mesh：

Year: 2004 PMID： 15322740 DOI： 10.1007/s00198-004-1681-7

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osteoporos Int ISSN： 0937-941X Impact factor: 4.507

19 in total

1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2001 Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Prevention and Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:
Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2001 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.443

2. Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale.

Authors:
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-09-17 Impact factor: 25.391

3. The diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors: J A Kanis; L J Melton; C Christiansen; C C Johnston; N Khaltaev
Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:
Journal: NIH Consens Statement Date: 2000 Mar 27-29

5. Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis.

Authors: S L Greenspan; L Maitland-Ramsey; E Myers
Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 4.333

6. Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors: Anna N A Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Cristina S Hammond; Megan M Moncur; G Thomas Ray; Gwen M Hebert; Alice R Pressman; Bruce Ettinger
Journal: Am J Med Date: 2003-08-15 Impact factor: 4.965

7. Influence of degenerative joint disease on spinal bone mineral measurements in postmenopausal women.

Authors: W Yu; C C Glüer; T Fuerst; S Grampp; J Li; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal: Calcif Tissue Int Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 4.333

8. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors: D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal: BMJ Date: 1996-05-18

Review 9. What are the criteria by which a densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis can be made in males and non-Caucasians?

Authors: Neil C Binkley; Peg Schmeer; Richard D Wasnich; Leon Lenchik
Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.963

10. Understanding the Bone Mass Measurement Act.

Authors: N B Watts
Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 1999 Impact factor: 2.963

55 in total

1. In vivo estimation of bone stiffness at the distal femur and proximal tibia using ultra-high-field 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and micro-finite element analysis.

Authors: Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; James S Babb; Stephen P Honig; Michael P Recht; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 2.626

2. Femoral Neck External Size but not aBMD Predicts Structural and Mass Changes for Women Transitioning Through Menopause.

Authors: Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kozminski; Erin Mr Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; Robert W Goulet; Sioban D Harlow; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez
Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 6.741

3. Evaluation of the patient positioning during DXA measurements in daily clinical practice.

Authors: Alp Cetin; Erkan Ozgüçlü; Levent Ozçakar; Ayşen Akinci
Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2007-10-27 Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4. Screening and early diagnosis of osteoporosis through X-ray and ultrasound based techniques.

Authors: Paola Pisani; Maria Daniela Renna; Francesco Conversano; Ernesto Casciaro; Maurizio Muratore; Eugenio Quarta; Marco Di Paola; Sergio Casciaro
Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2013-11-28

5. Low bone mineral density in Friedreich ataxia.

Authors: Andreas Eigentler; Wolfgang Nachbauer; Eveline Donnemiller; Werner Poewe; Rudolf W Gasser; Sylvia Boesch
Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 3.847

6. Osteoporosis assessment by whole body region vs. site-specific DXA.

Authors: L Joseph Melton; Anne C Looker; John A Shepherd; Michael K O'Connor; Sara J Achenbach; B Lawrence Riggs; Sundeep Khosla
Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-04-06 Impact factor: 4.507

7. Can bone quality be predicted accurately by Singh index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors: Cemal Bes; Melih Güven; Budak Akman; Evren Fehmi Atay; Emrah Ceviz; Mehmet Soy
Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 2.980

8. Exercise effects on bone mineral density in older adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: Elisa A Marques; Jorge Mota; Joana Carvalho
Journal: Age (Dordr) Date: 2011-09-16

9. Navel jewelry artifacts and intravertebral variation in spine bone densitometry in adolescents and young women.

Authors: Susan M Ott; Laura E Ichikawa; Andrea Z LaCroix; Delia Scholes
Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 2.617

10. Guidelines for Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Analysis of Trabecular Bone-Rich Regions in Mice: Improved Precision, Accuracy, and Sensitivity for Assessing Longitudinal Bone Changes.

Authors: Jiayu Shi; Soonchul Lee; Michael Uyeda; Justine Tanjaya; Jong Kil Kim; Hsin Chuan Pan; Patricia Reese; Louis Stodieck; Andy Lin; Kang Ting; Jin Hee Kwak; Chia Soo
Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2016-04-15 Impact factor: 3.056