Literature DB >> 17965590

Correlation of developmental differences of nuclear transfer embryos cells to the methylation profiles of nuclear transfer donor cells in Swine.

Aaron J Bonk1, Hee-Tae Cheong, Rongfeng Li, Liangxue Lai, Yanhong Hao, Zhonghua Liu, Melissa Samuel, Emily A Fergason, Kristin M Whitworth, Clifton N Murphy, Eric Antoniou, Randall S Prather.   

Abstract

Methylation of DNA is the most commonly studied epigenetic mechanism of developmental competence and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). Previous studies of epigenetics and the SCNT procedures have examined the effects of different culture media on donor cells and reconstructed embryos, and the methylation status of specific genes in the fetus or live offspring. Here we used a microarray based approach to identify the methylation profiles of SCNT donor cells including three clonal porcine fetal fibroblast-like cell sublines and adult somatic cells selected from kidney and mammary tissues. The methylation profiles of the donor cells were then analyzed with respect to their ability to direct development to the blastocyst stage after nuclear transfer. Clonal cell lines A2, A7 and A8 had blastocyst rates of 11.7%(a), 16.7%(ab) and 20.0%(b), respectively ((ab) p < 0.05). Adult somatic cells included kidney, mammary (large), and mammary (small) also had different blastocyst rates (ab p < 0.05) of 4.2% (a), 10.7% (ab) and 18.3% (b), respectively. For clonal donor cells and for adult somatic cell groups the donor cells with the highest blastocyst rates also had methylation profiles with the lowest similarity to the methylation profiles of the in vivo-produced blastocysts. Conversely, the donor cells with the lowest blastocyst rates had methylation profiles with the highest similarity to the methylation profiles of the in vivo-produced blastocysts. Our findings show there is an inverse correlation to the similarity of the methylation profiles of the donor cells and the in vivo-produced embryos, and to the blastocyst rates following SCNT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965590      PMCID: PMC2517257          DOI: 10.4161/epi.2.3.4844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epigenetics        ISSN: 1559-2294            Impact factor:   4.528


  35 in total

1.  Differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines generated from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer.

Authors:  T Wakayama; V Tabar; I Rodriguez; A C Perry; L Studer; P Mombaerts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Male and female mice derived from the same embryonic stem cell clone by tetraploid embryo complementation.

Authors:  Kevin Eggan; Anja Rode; Isabell Jentsch; Caroline Samuel; Thomas Hennek; Hartmut Tintrup; Branko Zevnik; Jennifer Erwin; Janet Loring; Laurie Jackson-Grusby; Michael R Speicher; Ralf Kuehn; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Pregnancy: a cloned horse born to its dam twin.

Authors:  Cesare Galli; Irina Lagutina; Gabriella Crotti; Silvia Colleoni; Paola Turini; Nunzia Ponderato; Roberto Duchi; Giovanna Lazzari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development.

Authors:  En Li
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice.

Authors:  D Humpherys; K Eggan; H Akutsu; K Hochedlinger; W M Rideout ; D Biniszkiewicz; R Yanagimachi; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Frequency and occurrence of late-gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos.

Authors:  Y Heyman; P Chavatte-Palmer; D LeBourhis; S Camous; X Vignon; J P Renard
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells.

Authors:  I A Polejaeva; S H Chen; T D Vaught; R L Page; J Mullins; S Ball; Y Dai; J Boone; S Walker; D L Ayares; A Colman; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-09-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cloned rabbits produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells.

Authors:  Patrick Chesné; Pierre G Adenot; Céline Viglietta; Michel Baratte; Laurent Boulanger; Jean-Paul Renard
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Monoclonal mice generated by nuclear transfer from mature B and T donor cells.

Authors:  Konrad Hochedlinger; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Fátima Santos; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Miodrag Stojkovic; Antoine Peters; Thomas Jenuwein; Eckhard Wolf; Wolf Reik; Wendy Dean
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Transcriptional, post-transcriptional and epigenetic control of porcine oocyte maturation and embryogenesis.

Authors:  R S Prather; J W Ross; S Clay Isom; J A Green
Journal:  Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  2009

2.  Positive correlation between the efficiency of induced pluripotent stem cells and the development rate of nuclear transfer embryos when the same porcine embryonic fibroblast lines are used as donor cells.

Authors:  Bingteng Xie; Jianyu Wang; Shichao Liu; Jiaqiang Wang; Binghua Xue; Jingyu Li; Renyue Wei; Yanhua Zhao; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.987

3.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming?

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Pharmacologic treatment of donor cells induced to have a Warburg effect-like metabolism does not alter embryonic development in vitro or survival during early gestation when used in somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs.

Authors:  Bethany R Mordhorst; Stephanie L Murphy; Renee M Ross; Joshua A Benne; Melissa S Samuel; Raissa F Cecil; Bethany K Redel; Lee D Spate; Clifton N Murphy; Kevin D Wells; Jonathan A Green; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.609

5.  Trichostatin A-mediated epigenetic transformation of adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells biases the in vitro developmental capability, quality, and pluripotency extent of porcine cloned embryos.

Authors:  Marcin Samiec; Jolanta Opiela; Daniel Lipiński; Joanna Romanek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Generation of Transgenic Cloned Buffalo Embryos Harboring the EGFP Gene in the Y Chromosome Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Targeted Integration.

Authors:  Xiuling Zhao; Junyu Nie; Yuyan Tang; Wengtan He; Kai Xiao; Chunying Pang; Xianwei Liang; Yangqing Lu; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-04-23

7.  Production of cloned pigs with targeted attenuation of gene expression.

Authors:  Vilceu Bordignon; Nayla El-Beirouthi; Bernardo G Gasperin; Marcelo S Albornoz; Mario A Martinez-Diaz; Carine Schneider; Denyse Laurin; David Zadworny; Luis B Agellon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Ovulation Statuses of Surrogate Gilts Are Associated with the Efficiency of Excellent Pig Cloning.

Authors:  Yanjun Huan; Kui Hu; Bingteng Xie; Yongqian Shi; Feng Wang; Yang Zhou; Shichao Liu; Bo Huang; Jiang Zhu; Zhongfeng Liu; Yilong He; Jingyu Li; Qingran Kong; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Alteration of the DNA methylation status of donor cells impairs the developmental competence of porcine cloned embryos.

Authors:  Yan Jun Huan; Zhan Feng Wu; Ji Guang Zhang; Jiang Zhu; Bing Teng Xie; Jian Yu Wang; Jing Yu Li; Bing Hua Xue; Qing Ran Kong; Zhong Hua Liu
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.214

10.  Porcine Fetal-Derived Fibroblasts Alter Gene Expression and Mitochondria to Compensate for Hypoxic Stress During Culture.

Authors:  Bethany R Mordhorst; Stephanie L Murphy; Martin Schauflinger; Shirley Rojas Salazar; Tieming Ji; Susanta K Behura; Kevin D Wells; Jonathan A Green; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.