Literature DB >> 20931660

Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming?

Kristin M Whitworth1, Randall S Prather.   

Abstract

Fertile offspring from somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is the goal of most cloning laboratories. For this process to be successful, a number of events must occur correctly. First the donor nucleus must be in a state that is amenable to remodeling and subsequent genomic reprogramming. The nucleus must be introduced into an oocyte cytoplasm that is capable of facilitating the nuclear remodeling. The oocyte must then be adequately stimulated to initiate development. Finally the resulting embryo must be cultured in an environment that is compatible with the development of that particular embryo. Much has been learned about the incredible changes that occur to a nucleus after it is placed in the cytoplasm of an oocyte. While we think that we are gaining an understanding of the reorganization that occurs to proteins in the donor nucleus, the process of cloning is still very inefficient. Below we will introduce the procedures for SCNT, discuss nuclear remodeling and reprogramming, and review techniques that may improve reprogramming. Finally we will briefly touch on other aspects of SCNT that may improve the development of cloned embryos.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20931660      PMCID: PMC4718708          DOI: 10.1002/mrd.21242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  163 in total

1.  Parthenogenetic activation of porcine oocytes after nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Z Macháty; L F Rickords; R S Prather
Journal:  Cloning       Date:  1999

2.  Localization of chorionic pregnancy-associated glycoprotein family in the pig.

Authors:  Marta Majewska; Grzegorz Panasiewicz; Mariusz Majewski; Bozena Szafranska
Journal:  Reprod Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.376

3.  Inefficient reprogramming of the hematopoietic stem cell genome following nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Kimiko Inoue; Narumi Ogonuki; Hiromi Miki; Michiko Hirose; Shinichi Noda; Jin-Moon Kim; Fugaku Aoki; Hiroyuki Miyoshi; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Rapid elimination of the histone variant MacroH2A from somatic cell heterochromatin after nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Ching-Chien Chang; Shaorong Gao; Li-Ying Sung; Gareth N Corry; Yinghong Ma; Zsolt Peter Nagy; X Cindy Tian; Theodore P Rasmussen
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Embryonic germ cells induce epigenetic reprogramming of somatic nucleus in hybrid cells.

Authors:  M Tada; T Tada; L Lefebvre; S C Barton; M A Surani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Effect of epigenetic regulation during swine embryogenesis and on cloning by nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jianguo Zhao; Jeffrey Whyte; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Evaluation of gestational deficiencies in cloned sheep fetuses and placentae.

Authors:  P A De Sousa; T King; L Harkness; L E Young; S K Walker; I Wilmut
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.285

8.  Genetic reprogramming of lactate dehydrogenase, citrate synthase, and phosphofructokinase mRNA in bovine nuclear transfer embryos produced using bovine fibroblast cell nuclei.

Authors:  Q A Winger; J R Hill; T Shin; A J Watson; D C Kraemer; M E Westhusin
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.609

9.  Complete activation of porcine oocytes induced by the sulfhydryl reagent, thimerosal.

Authors:  Z Macháty; W H Wang; B N Day; R S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  High in vitro development after somatic cell nuclear transfer and trichostatin A treatment of reconstructed porcine embryos.

Authors:  J Li; O Svarcova; K Villemoes; P M Kragh; M Schmidt; I B Bøgh; Y Zhang; Y Du; L Lin; S Purup; Q Xue; L Bolund; H Yang; P Maddox-Hyttel; G Vajta
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 2.740

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  New routes for transgenesis of the mouse.

Authors:  José E Belizário; Priscilla Akamini; Philip Wolf; Bryan Strauss; José Xavier-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Trophectoderm regeneration to support full-term development in the inner cell mass isolated from bovine blastocyst.

Authors:  Nanami Kohri; Hiroki Akizawa; Sakie Iisaka; Hanako Bai; Yojiro Yanagawa; Masashi Takahashi; Masaya Komatsu; Masahito Kawai; Masashi Nagano; Manabu Kawahara
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Stem cell therapy: an exercise in patience and prudence.

Authors:  Huan-Ting Lin; Makoto Otsu; Hiromitsu Nakauchi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Positive correlation between the efficiency of induced pluripotent stem cells and the development rate of nuclear transfer embryos when the same porcine embryonic fibroblast lines are used as donor cells.

Authors:  Bingteng Xie; Jianyu Wang; Shichao Liu; Jiaqiang Wang; Binghua Xue; Jingyu Li; Renyue Wei; Yanhua Zhao; Zhonghua Liu
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.987

5.  Zygote injection of RNA encoding Cre recombinase results in efficient removal of LoxP flanked neomycin cassettes in pigs.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Raissa Cecil; Joshua A Benne; Bethany K Redel; Lee D Spate; Melissa S Samuel; Randall S Prather; Kevin D Wells
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Pharmacologic treatment of donor cells induced to have a Warburg effect-like metabolism does not alter embryonic development in vitro or survival during early gestation when used in somatic cell nuclear transfer in pigs.

Authors:  Bethany R Mordhorst; Stephanie L Murphy; Renee M Ross; Joshua A Benne; Melissa S Samuel; Raissa F Cecil; Bethany K Redel; Lee D Spate; Clifton N Murphy; Kevin D Wells; Jonathan A Green; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.609

7.  Effects of donor fibroblast cell type and transferred cloned embryo number on the efficiency of pig cloning.

Authors:  Zicong Li; Junsong Shi; Dewu Liu; Rong Zhou; Haiyu Zeng; Xiu Zhou; Ranbiao Mai; Shaofen Zeng; Lvhua Luo; Wanxian Yu; Shouquan Zhang; Zhenfang Wu
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.987

8.  Direct introduction of gene constructs into the pronucleus-like structure of cloned embryos: a new strategy for the generation of genetically modified pigs.

Authors:  Mayuko Kurome; Simon Leuchs; Barbara Kessler; Elisabeth Kemter; Eva-Maria Jemiller; Beatrix Foerster; Nikolai Klymiuk; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.788

9.  Epigenetic modification of fetal fibroblasts improves developmental competency and gene expression in porcine cloned embryos.

Authors:  B Mohana Kumar; Geun-Ho Maeng; Yeon-Mi Lee; Jeong-Hyeon Lee; Byeong-Gyun Jeon; Sun-A Ock; Taeyoung Kang; Gyu-Jin Rho
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.459

10.  Transcriptome Analysis of Pig In Vivo, In Vitro-Fertilized, and Nuclear Transfer Blastocyst-Stage Embryos Treated with Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Postfusion and Activation Reveals Changes in the Lysosomal Pathway.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Jiude Mao; Kiho Lee; William G Spollen; Melissa S Samuel; Eric M Walters; Lee D Spate; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.987

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.