Literature DB >> 11875572

Monoclonal mice generated by nuclear transfer from mature B and T donor cells.

Konrad Hochedlinger1, Rudolf Jaenisch.   

Abstract

Cloning from somatic cells is inefficient, with most clones dying during gestation. Cloning from embryonic stem (ES) cells is much more effective, suggesting that the nucleus of an embryonic cell is easier to reprogram. It is thus possible that most surviving clones are, in fact, derived from the nuclei of rare somatic stem cells present in adult tissues, rather than from the nuclei of differentiated cells, as has been assumed. Here we report the generation of monoclonal mice by nuclear transfer from mature lymphocytes. In a modified two-step cloning procedure, we established ES cells from cloned blastocysts and injected them into tetraploid blastocysts to generate mice. In this approach, the embryo is derived from the ES cells and the extra-embryonic tissues from the tetraploid host. Animals cloned from a B-cell nucleus were viable and carried fully rearranged immunoglobulin alleles in all tissues. Similarly, a mouse cloned from a T-cell nucleus carried rearranged T-cell-receptor genes in all tissues. This is an unequivocal demonstration that a terminally differentiated cell can be reprogrammed to produce an adult cloned animal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11875572     DOI: 10.1038/nature718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  121 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches.

Authors:  Shinya Yamanaka; Helen M Blau
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The genus Xenopus as a multispecies model for evolutionary and comparative immunobiology of the 21st century.

Authors:  Jacques Robert; Nicholas Cohen
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Biography of Rudolf Jaenisch.

Authors:  Christen Brownlee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Programming and reprogramming neuronal subtypes in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Caroline Rouaux; Salman Bhai; Paola Arlotta
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.964

Review 5.  Nuclear reprogramming and epigenetic rejuvenation.

Authors:  Prim B Singh; Fred Zacouto
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Recipient cell nuclear factors are required for reprogramming by nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Dieter Egli; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Development       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 7.  Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications.

Authors:  Matthias Stadtfeld; Konrad Hochedlinger
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Proteome of mouse oocytes at different developmental stages.

Authors:  Shufang Wang; Zhaohui Kou; Zhiyi Jing; Yu Zhang; Xinzheng Guo; Mengqiu Dong; Ian Wilmut; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Induced pluripotency as a potential path towards iNKT cell-mediated cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Watarai; Daisuke Yamada; Shin-ichiro Fujii; Masaru Taniguchi; Haruhiko Koseki
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 10.  Mediators of reprogramming: transcription factors and transitions through mitosis.

Authors:  Dieter Egli; Garrett Birkhoff; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 94.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.