Literature DB >> 17956845

Unexpected male choosiness for mates in a spider.

M C Bel-Venner1, S Dray, D Allainé, F Menu, S Venner.   

Abstract

Sexual selection theory traditionally considers choosiness for mates to be negatively related to intra-sexual competition. Males were classically considered to be the competing, but not the choosy, sex. However, evidence of male choosiness is now accumulating. Male choosiness is expected to increase with an individual's competitive ability, and to decrease as intra-sexual competition increases. However, such predictions have never been tested in field conditions. Here, we explore male mate choice in a spider by studying size-assortative pairing in two natural sites that strongly differ in the level of male-male competition. Unexpectedly, our results demonstrate that mate choice shifts from opportunism to high selectivity as competition between males increases. Males experiencing weak competition did not exhibit size-related mating preferences. By contrast, when competition was intense we found strong size-assortative pairing due to male choice: while larger, more competitive males preferentially paired with larger, more fecund females, smaller males chose smaller females. Thus, we show that mating preferences of males vary with their competitive ability. The distinct preferences exhibited by males of different sizes seem to be an adaptive response to the lower reproductive opportunities arising from increased competition between males.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17956845      PMCID: PMC2562406          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  22 in total

1.  Why are female birds ornamented?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Male mating preference for female survivorship in the seaweed fly Gluma musgravei (Diptera: Coelopidae).

Authors:  D W Dunn; C S Crean; A S Gilburn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Rufus A Johnstone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

5.  Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish.

Authors:  Elisabet Forsgren; Trond Amundsen; Asa A Borg; Jens Bjelvenmark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases.

Authors:  Bernhard A Huber
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-08

7.  Male potential reproductive rate influences mate choice in a bushcricket.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality.

Authors:  N Burley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Intrasexual competition and sexual selection in cooperative mammals.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; S J Hodge; G Spong; A F Russell; N R Jordan; N C Bennett; L L Sharpe; M B Manser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  14 in total

1.  Are high-quality mates always attractive?: State-dependent mate preferences in birds and humans.

Authors:  Katharina Riebel; Marie-Jeanne Holveck; Simon Verhulst; Tim W Fawcett
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Evolution of male and female choice in polyandrous systems.

Authors:  Mikael Puurtinen; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.

Authors:  Rafael R Moura; Marcelo O Gonzaga
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-03-13

4.  Do unattractive friends make you look better? Context-dependent male mating preferences in the guppy.

Authors:  Clelia Gasparini; Giovanna Serena; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.

Authors:  Loïc Etienne; François Rousset; Bernard Godelle; Alexandre Courtiol
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Luana S Maroja; Zachary M McKenzie; Elizabeth Hart; Joy Jing; Erica L Larson; David P Richardson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Mating-induced sexual inhibition in the jumping spider Servaea incana (Araneae: Salticidae): A fast-acting and long-lasting effect.

Authors:  Vivian Mendez; Rowan H McGinley; Phillip W Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Covariation and repeatability of male mating effort and mating preferences in a promiscuous fish.

Authors:  Jean-Guy J Godin; Heather L Auld
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 9.  A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within-sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility.

Authors:  Malin Ah-King; Patricia Adair Gowaty
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  The evolution of genital complexity and mating rates in sexually size dimorphic spiders.

Authors:  Matjaž Kuntner; Ren-Chung Cheng; Simona Kralj-Fišer; Chen-Pan Liao; Jutta M Schneider; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.