Literature DB >> 28289773

Temporal variation in size-assortative mating and male mate choice in a spider with amphisexual care.

Rafael R Moura1, Marcelo O Gonzaga2.   

Abstract

Males should be more selective when they have a high investment in reproduction, especially in species with biparental or paternal care. In this context, male mate choice can promote size-assortative mating (SAM) when (1) large males win intrasexual disputes, (2) large females are more fecund, and (3) males prefer larger females to smaller ones. In the spider Manogea porracea, males exhibit high reproductive investment by building their webs above those of females and exhibiting extended care of offspring in the absence of females. Under these circumstances, we expect the occurrence of SAM and male preference for large females. Herein, we performed observations and experiments in the field to evaluate the hypotheses that (1) M. porracea mates assortatively by size and (2) SAM is influenced by male mate choice. Furthermore, we measured variables that could affect mating patterns, the sex ratios, and densities of both sexes. Pairing in M. porracea was positively size-assortative in 2012, but not in 2013. Large males won most disputes for mates and preferred larger females, which produced more eggs. The inconsistency in detection of SAM was due to population dynamics, namely variations in sex ratio and population density across the breeding season. Furthermore, we found that the significance of male mate choice on sexual selection of body size in M. porracea strongly depends on the competition intensity for mating opportunities. The traditional sexual selection hypothesis of SAM needs to be reviewed and must include measures of competition intensity.

Keywords:  Female fecundity; Intrasexual disputes; Male preference; OSR; Size-assortative pairing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28289773     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-017-1448-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  24 in total

1.  Positive assortative mating between recently described sympatric morphs of Icelandic sticklebacks.

Authors:  Gudbjörg A Olafsdóttir; Michael G Ritchie; Sigurdur S Snorrason
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  The mismeasurement of sexual selection.

Authors:  H Klug; J Heuschele; M D Jennions; H Kokko
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Male potential reproductive rate influences mate choice in a bushcricket.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 4.  The evolution and significance of male mate choice.

Authors:  Dominic A Edward; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  THE HERITABILITY OF EXTERNAL MORPHOLOGY IN DARWIN'S GROUND FINCHES (GEOSPIZA) ON ISLA DAPHNE MAJOR, GALÁPAGOS.

Authors:  Peter T Boag
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  MUTUAL MATE CHOICE AND SEX DIFFERENCES IN CHOOSINESS.

Authors:  Rufus A Johnstone; John D Reynolds; James C Deutsch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Assortative mating in animals.

Authors:  Yuexin Jiang; Daniel I Bolnick; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems.

Authors:  S T Emlen; L W Oring
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  INCIPIENT REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN TWO SYMPATRIC MORPHS OF THE INTERTIDAL SNAIL LITTORINA SAXATILIS.

Authors:  Kerstin Johannesson; Emilio Rolán-Alvarez; Anette Ekendahl
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Interspecific competition influences fitness benefits of assortative mating for territorial aggression in eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis).

Authors:  Morgan R Harris; Lynn Siefferman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.